Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> On Mon, March 16, 2015 1:06 pm, Erwann Abalea wrote:
>>
>> Phase RSA1024 out? I vote for it. Where's the ballot? :)
>
> This is a browser-side change. No ballot required (the only issue *should*
> be non-BR compliant certificates issued before the BR effective date)
>
> https
On Mon, March 16, 2015 1:06 pm, Erwann Abalea wrote:
>
> Phase RSA1024 out? I vote for it. Where's the ballot? :)
This is a browser-side change. No ballot required (the only issue *should*
be non-BR compliant certificates issued before the BR effective date)
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/is
Le lundi 16 mars 2015 19:47:30 UTC+1, Ryan Sleevi a écrit :
> On Mon, March 16, 2015 10:24 am, Erwann Abalea wrote:
> > Le lundi 16 mars 2015 10:29:08 UTC+1, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> > > On 2015-03-14 01:23, kim@safe-mail.net wrote:
> > > > Is there an agreed timeline for deprecation of the tec
On Mon, March 16, 2015 10:24 am, Erwann Abalea wrote:
> Le lundi 16 mars 2015 10:29:08 UTC+1, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> > On 2015-03-14 01:23, kim@safe-mail.net wrote:
> > > Is there an agreed timeline for deprecation of the technologies listed
> > in the initial posting? We should be proactive
Le lundi 16 mars 2015 10:29:08 UTC+1, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> On 2015-03-14 01:23, kim@safe-mail.net wrote:
> > Is there an agreed timeline for deprecation of the technologies listed in
> > the initial posting? We should be proactive in this field.
> >
> > For example, last month a plan to dep
On 2015-03-14 01:23, kim.da...@safe-mail.net wrote:
Is there an agreed timeline for deprecation of the technologies listed in the
initial posting? We should be proactive in this field.
For example, last month a plan to deploy 12000 devices to medical professionals
has been finalised, despite t
6 matches
Mail list logo
