On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
>>
>> I filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1095272 about
>> this. I've written several patches that fix problems, one of which has
>> r+ and is awaiting checkin; check the dependent bugs.
>
> In your analysis, it would be better t
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
wrote:
> I've been doing some heap allocation profiling and found that during
> basic usage NSS accounts for 1/3 of all of Firefox's cumulative (*not*
> live) heap allocations. We're talking gigabytes of allocations in
> short browsing sessions.
Personally, I would like to encourage your efforts. If you are able to
move many of these allocations from heap-based with locks, to something
stack-based instead, this will improve NSS server performance
tremendously. I would be surprised if it was a significant boost to
client apps like Firef
On Mon, November 10, 2014 6:51 pm, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been doing some heap allocation profiling and found that during
> basic usage NSS accounts for 1/3 of all of Firefox's cumulative (*not*
> live) heap allocations. We're talking gigabytes of allocations in
> short brow
Hi,
I've been doing some heap allocation profiling and found that during
basic usage NSS accounts for 1/3 of all of Firefox's cumulative (*not*
live) heap allocations. We're talking gigabytes of allocations in
short browsing sessions. That is *insane*.
I filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bu
On Saturday 08 November 2014 10:29:06 Kosuke Kaizuka wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 01:35:08 +0900, Kosuke Kaizuka wrote:> On Wed, 22
>
> Oct 2014 00:59:53 -0700, Brian Smith wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Hubert Kario wrote:
> >>> The number of sites that prefer RC4 while still supp
6 matches
Mail list logo
