> Maybe because the removal wasn't proposed at that time? Now there is a
> proposal to remove something that has no working (not even standardized)
> successor. Also, people using this stuff are really far away from W3C.
Firefox had a competitive advantage in supporting this.
It would have been w
This discussion started in the CA/Browser Forum public list; I'm moving it here
at Gerv's suggestion.
Mozilla recently posted its SHA-1 policy here:
https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2014/09/23/phasing-out-certificates-with-sha-1-based-signature-algorithms/.
This blog is helpful, but not comple
2 matches
Mail list logo
