The NSS Development Team announces the release of NSS 3.16.2.
Network Security Services (NSS) 3.16.2 is a patch release for NSS 3.16.
New functionality:
* DTLS 1.2 is supported.
* The TLS application layer protocol negotiation (ALPN) extension
is also supported on the server side.
* RSA-OEAP i
- Original Message -
> From: "Kurt Roeckx"
> To: mozilla-dev-tech-cry...@lists.mozilla.org
> Sent: Monday, 30 June, 2014 1:57:33 PM
> Subject: Re: Road to RC4-free web (the case for YouTube without RC4)
>
> On 2014-06-30 12:20, Hubert Kario wrote:
> >> From: "Kurt Roeckx"
> >> On 2014-06
- Original Message -
> From: "Brian Smith"
> To: "mozilla's crypto code discussion list"
>
> Sent: Monday, 30 June, 2014 12:23:41 AM
> Subject: Re: Road to RC4-free web (the case for YouTube without RC4)
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Hubert Kario wrote:
>
> > Because of that,
On 2014-06-30 12:20, Hubert Kario wrote:
From: "Kurt Roeckx"
On 2014-06-30 02:35, Hubert Kario wrote:
I have to disagree here. Even 1024 bit DHE requires a targeted attack at
~80 bit
complexity. Currently we see RC4 at around 56 bit, with a completely
unoptimized
attack...
Do you have a refe
Am 27.06.2014 18:32, schrieb Brian Smith:
> However, I think that is a good idea anyway, because Firefox (and
> Thunderbird) should be using the native OS for client certificates and
> S/MIME certificates anyway.
Additionally or exclusive?
When I think of using smartcard-based client certificates
- Original Message -
> From: "Kurt Roeckx"
> To: mozilla-dev-tech-cry...@lists.mozilla.org
> Sent: Monday, 30 June, 2014 10:56:13 AM
> Subject: Re: Road to RC4-free web (the case for YouTube without RC4)
>
> On 2014-06-30 02:35, Hubert Kario wrote:
> >> The benefits of ECDHE outweigh the
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
Hi
> The issue is that the WebCrypto API uses a totally separate keystore from
> the X.509 client certificate keystore (if it doesn't, it should be), and
> the stuff that Red Hat does is about client certificates. AFAICT, WebCrypto
> doesn't
On 2014-06-30 02:35, Hubert Kario wrote:
The benefits of ECDHE outweigh the risks of using RC4,
I have to disagree here. Even 1024 bit DHE requires a targeted attack at ~80 bit
complexity. Currently we see RC4 at around 56 bit, with a completely unoptimized
attack...
Do you have a reference f
8 matches
Mail list logo