Re: Removal of generateCRMFRequest

2013-09-28 Thread Brian Smith
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Sean Leonard wrote: > On 9/27/2013 5:51 PM, Robert Relyea wrote: >> >> I don't have a problem with going for an industry standard way of doing >> all of these things, but it's certainly pretty presumptuous to remove these >> features without supplying the industry

Re: Removal of generateCRMFRequest

2013-09-28 Thread Sean Leonard
On 9/27/2013 5:51 PM, Robert Relyea wrote: I don't have a problem with going for an industry standard way of doing all of these things, but it's certainly pretty presumptuous to remove these features without supplying the industry standard replacements and time for them to filter through the in

Re: Removal of generateCRMFRequest

2013-09-28 Thread Eddy Nigg
On 09/28/2013 04:14 AM, From Ryan Sleevi: I certainly am not one to make decisions about Firefox's goals for the Web Platform, given what I work on, but I applaud efforts to remove non-standard features and to standardize features. But I don't think one must be held hostage to the other - the f

Re: Removal of generateCRMFRequest

2013-09-28 Thread Eddy Nigg
On 09/28/2013 03:51 AM, From Robert Relyea: Ryan is correct. What FF does not do is reload the page when the smart card is removed. The most common use of smart card events is forcing the reloading the page. Correct - and the current session on the application level can be invalidated. Someth