Hello,
The Mozilla api documentation shows that
org.mozilla.jss.crypto.JSSMessageDigest class has been deprecated.
How can I create a SHA1 hash using JSS?
Thanks.
-Paula
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
Hello,
The Mozilla api documentation shows that
org.mozilla.jss.crypto.JSSMessageDigest class has been deprecated.
How can I create a SHA1 hash using JSS?
Thanks.
-Paula
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/JSSMessageDigest-tp33545038p33545038.html
Sent from the Mozilla -
Hello all,
I was wondering if folks know the best way to add additional signed
attributes to CMS signed data messages. I see in cms.h there's a
NSS_CMSSignerInfo_AddAutiAttr function, but it doesn't appear to be
exported (at least, I get undefined reference errors when I try to use it).
I'm
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
>
> I don't know what platform JV is on, but I know on Mac OS X,
> all the internal symbols in FreeBL and maybe other libraries
> are exported. This is how the Firefox Sync developers got
> so far in developing their JavaScript implementation of J
Robert Relyea wrote:
> On 03/24/2012 03:05 PM, VJ wrote:
> > I'm trying to use RSA_HashCheckSign() function to verify the
> > message.
> How are you even Linking with RSA_HashCheckSign()?
I don't know what platform JV is on, but I know on Mac OS X, all the internal
symbols in FreeBL and maybe oth
helpcrypto helpcrypto wrote:
> IMHO, this is some that needs some clarification, as Mozilla *IS*
> supporting it developing JSS but at the same time saying "we do not
> support it",
Some people who are part of the Mozilla project maintain JSS. I will help
review patches to JSS if/when the member
> Today, a buggy old/legacy modutil.exe binary we are using, made me
> try building NSS using mingw. Once again.
The only way I recommend building NSS on Windows is with Microsoft Visual C++
and the mozilla-build package located at
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Windows_Build_Prerequisites#Moz
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Anders Rundgren
wrote:
>
> Mozilla should IMO rather hook into the
> other vendors cryptographic solution, possibly at the expense of NSS.
>
> According to a [colleage] of mine Chrome even use the platform's SSL
> implementation! Well, not in *NIX since there is n
On 2012-04-04 13:04, helpcrypto helpcrypto wrote:
> IIRC, NSS doesnt have an official mantainer on Mozilla bugs, isnt it?
> If this happens, its probably the source of many problems here. I have
> filed a few bugs and most of then arent even checked.
> To be fair & honest, im also guilty of that, b
IIRC, NSS doesnt have an official mantainer on Mozilla bugs, isnt it?
If this happens, its probably the source of many problems here. I have
filed a few bugs and most of then arent even checked.
To be fair & honest, im also guilty of that, but i dont feel confident
enough to edit Mozilla source.
Co
On 2012-04-02 21:07, Robert Relyea wrote:
> On 03/27/2012 01:00 AM, helpcrypto helpcrypto wrote:
>> Cough, cough...exit(CKR_OK) != return CKR_OK...cough, cough
>> Now cert8 is modified always (with or without our module).
>>
>> Anyway, can someone tell me why cert8 is rewrited on each run/close?
>
11 matches
Mail list logo