On 3/08/11 8:38 PM, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
When the
framework was developed, and all that remained to be done was writing any
tests that run in it, the framework developers quit.
"You need a framework" is the 21st century version of that old epigram,
"I've got a bridge to sell you..." :)
S
On 2011-08-03 02:22 PDT, Ludovic Hirlimann wrote:
> I know, by reading various bug comments, that NSS as some machines
> dedicated to testing somewhere. And from what I read It seems that these
> tests suites are started manually.
You have been misinformed.
For NSS, there is a collection of mach
For the last little while I've been working on p11-kit, and integrating
it into various projects across the open source community.
http://p11-glue.freedesktop.org/p11-kit.html
One of the main issues it tries to solve, is that of a standard
configuration/registry for PKCS#11 modules. This has seve
Hi,
I've been following NSS and PSM bugs over the last few years. Once in a
while an external contributors come up with a patch - and the review
process is slow mainly because the module owners fear that accepting the
patch might trigger regressions.
This is bad for the module and for the contribu
On 08/02/2011 09:51 PM, Robert Relyea wrote:
> NSS has been facing these issues for a while now. After trying to get
> something going in the PKCS #11 working group we finally implemented
> this internally:
Yes, certainly. I evaluated that design while researching this topic.
It's certainly a nice
5 matches
Mail list logo