> Kurt, I suggest you try posting this again, without the image, but WITH
> the certificate that caused Certificate Patrol to complain. As it is,
> there's no information in this posting with which anyone can help you.
That would be the PEM file I placed in the directory.
https://www.seifried.o
On 4/11/2010 7:48 PM, Nelson Bolyard wrote:
On 2010-04-08 09:59 PST, Robert Relyea wrote:
On 04/07/2010 09:35 PM, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
We plan on alerting users in a future update. This is fair warning
to server operators and those who are debugging their sites.
If this is a real threat do
On 2010-04-08 09:59 PST, Robert Relyea wrote:
> On 04/07/2010 09:35 PM, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> We plan on alerting users in a future update. This is fair warning
> to server operators and those who are debugging their sites.
>
If this is a real threat don't users deser
On 2010-04-10 18:33 PST, Kurt Seifried wrote:
> So I logged in to a bank today and Certificate Patrol threw up a
> warning I haven't seen before (see attached image).
Kurt, I suggest you try posting this again, without the image, but WITH
the certificate that caused Certificate Patrol to complain
Amax Guan wrote:
Hi Anders,
Thank you very much for your reply, and I like your suggestion, I
think the token parameter will handle most cases. However, it seems
it's not gonna happen fast enough for my case. So, is there a
alternative way other than that can be used to solve this
problem?
Hi Anders,
Thank you very much for your reply, and I like your suggestion, I
think the token parameter will handle most cases. However, it seems
it's not gonna happen fast enough for my case. So, is there a
alternative way other than that can be used to solve this
problem?
I checked the
Amax Guan wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on a Certificate renew process for a bank in china.
The bank stored the certificate in a USB key, and when the user needs
to renew the certificate, the bank will trigger the cert issue process
to do that, using . But when the issue begins, because the USB
key,
On 10.04.2010 13:37, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote:
> On 31/03/2010 17:11, Kaspar Brand wrote:
>> That's the code which is used by nsCMSMessage
>> (http://mxr.mozilla.org/comm-central/ident?i=nsCMSMessage), and
>> therefore also by Seamonkey.
>
> Are you certain ?
Yes, I'm sure that libmime uses nsC
8 matches
Mail list logo