Re: Microsec Root Inclusion Request Round 2

2009-03-13 Thread Kyle Hamilton
I note no outstanding issues, and recommend approval. I'd like to see a photo of how the security tape is wound through the paper translation, but that's just a matter of personal curiosity. :) -Kyle H On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Kathleen Wilson wrote: > Are there still questions that nee

Re: Certigna Root Inclusion Request Round 2

2009-03-13 Thread Eddy Nigg
On 03/13/2009 07:34 PM, Kathleen Wilson: Certigna met our request to post and translate the relevant portions of their CPS. There has been very little resulting discussion. Are there still questions that need to be addressed in this public discussion phase? Or shall I move forward with making th

Re: Microsec Root Inclusion Request Round 2

2009-03-13 Thread Eddy Nigg
On 03/13/2009 07:29 PM, Kathleen Wilson: Are there still questions that need to be addressed in this public discussion phase? Or shall I move forward with making the recommendation to approve this request? I have once again reviewed the letter of confirmation from the National Communications A

Re: Certigna Root Inclusion Request Round 2

2009-03-13 Thread Kathleen Wilson
Certigna met our request to post and translate the relevant portions of their CPS. There has been very little resulting discussion. Are there still questions that need to be addressed in this public discussion phase? Or shall I move forward with making the recommendation to approve this request? -

Re: Microsec Root Inclusion Request Round 2

2009-03-13 Thread Kathleen Wilson
Are there still questions that need to be addressed in this public discussion phase? Or shall I move forward with making the recommendation to approve this request? -- dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Re: Current algorithm support for Firefox?

2009-03-13 Thread Wan-Teh Chang
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: > > Are you thinking about adding support for the SHA256 based cipher-suites > from RFC5246 ? I really think SHA-2 support in TLS should be high priority, > the more given that it's little work to implement. I'm interested in seeing TLS

Re: Current algorithm support for Firefox?

2009-03-13 Thread Wan-Teh Chang
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Kyle Hamilton wrote: > "Note: Some technologies listed here are not currently implemented, > but are planned for implementation in an upcoming release." > > Are all of these actually implemented in the latest 3.11 release? This document was used for product export