Hans Petter Jansson wrote, On 2008-11-15 17:57:
> On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 22:56 -0800, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
>> Hans Petter Jansson wrote, On 2008-11-14 21:54:
>
>>> This works for some databases, but not others.
> It's on separate workstations, but in some cases one database migrates
> successf
Thank Nelson, it work...
Actually I already read rfc2246 and others many times, switch from ssl
to tls v1.0 back and fort, tried rc4, and even got worse.
Rusdy
Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> Rusdy13 wrote, On 2008-11-12 02:25:
> > I've been developing a web server (research) based on ssl version 3 d
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 22:56 -0800, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> Hans Petter Jansson wrote, On 2008-11-14 21:54:
> > This works for some databases, but not others. It doesn't seem to matter
> > which application created the database (I've tried with databases from
> > Firefox and Evolution) - e.g. one
What are the problems with overspecified Authority Key ID fields?
(i.e., both key ID and issuer's name/serialnumber)? I'm noticing that
it's part of the Certificate Policy v1.2 (paragraph 4, in the
'incorrect extensions' bullet point), but I still haven't been able to
figure it out.
Is there some
On 11/15/2008 10:04 PM, Paul Hoffman:
At 8:20 PM +0200 11/15/08, Eddy Nigg wrote:
Lets stay focused!
This thread started off with a purported newbie having a problem with seeing
self-signed certs where she shouldn't have. It then morphed into a discussion
of security UI design. Then it went
At 8:20 PM +0200 11/15/08, Eddy Nigg wrote:
>Lets stay focused!
This thread started off with a purported newbie having a problem with seeing
self-signed certs where she shouldn't have. It then morphed into a discussion
of security UI design. Then it went to what users shold and should not be tol
On 11/15/2008 05:57 PM, Wes Kussmaul:
Eddy Nigg wrote:
On 11/15/2008 05:19 PM, Florian Weimer:
* Alaric Dailey:
DNSSEC is an assertion of validitity of the DNS.
EV certs assert that the business behind the cert is legit.
Only that a legal entity exists (whether its "legitimate" is not
checke
Eddy Nigg wrote:
On 11/15/2008 05:19 PM, Florian Weimer:
* Alaric Dailey:
DNSSEC is an assertion of validitity of the DNS.
EV certs assert that the business behind the cert is legit.
Only that a legal entity exists (whether its "legitimate" is not
checked). EV certificates are routinely issu
On 11/15/2008 05:19 PM, Florian Weimer:
* Alaric Dailey:
DNSSEC is an assertion of validitity of the DNS.
EV certs assert that the business behind the cert is legit.
Only that a legal entity exists (whether its "legitimate" is not
checked). EV certificates are routinely issued to organizatio
* Alaric Dailey:
> DNSSEC is an assertion of validitity of the DNS.
> EV certs assert that the business behind the cert is legit.
Only that a legal entity exists (whether its "legitimate" is not
checked). EV certificates are routinely issued to organizations which
do not run the business which e
On 11/15/2008 05:14 AM, Frank Hecker:
One of the things I'm trying to do (with lots of help from Kathleen
Wilson) is to document how the CA evaluation process works, so that CAs
can have a better understanding of what will happen during the process
and what they will be asked to do. A primary pro
11 matches
Mail list logo
