I vote no on this proposal due to OCSP interoperability issues.
-Kyle H
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Nelson B Bolyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> István Zsolt BERTA wrote, On 2008-10-07 07:07:
>> As I see we all agree on the fact that a 'trusted responder' can exist
>> according to RFC 2560,
István Zsolt BERTA wrote, On 2008-10-07 07:07:
> As I see we all agree on the fact that a 'trusted responder' can exist
> according to RFC 2560, and it is possible that an OCSP responder
> certificate is under a separate root. (There are various scenarios for
> providing OCSP service, it can be pro
On 10/10/2008 01:45 PM, Ian G:
Finally, if it ever did get to court, I don't see any good reasons
why it would not stand up?
Well, I prefer to refrain from commenting on this, but the fact that I
mentioned it could give you some hint ;-)
( I should clarify things here: there is certainly
On 10/03/2008 12:43 AM, Frank Hecker:
I am now opening the first public discussion period for a request from
Microtec Ltd to add the Microsec e-Szigno Root CA root certificate to
Mozilla. This is bug 370505, and Kathleen has produced an information
document attached to the bug.
Besides the is
On 10/02/2008 07:37 PM, Frank Hecker:
OK, if no one cares one way or the other I'll move the start of public
comments to Thursdays.
Shouldn't have been there an announcement for bug 371362 or shall we
simply follow the schedule? I guess a summary from you would be in any
case useful as you'
5 matches
Mail list logo
