On Jul 30, 1:02 pm, Nelson B Bolyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I checked other tabs but got nothing.
> > I found firefox 2.x and 3.0 can work but version 1.5 can not.
> > Is there any difference of key db between firefox 3.0(2.x) and firefox
> > 1.5?
>
> I don't reme
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I checked other tabs but got nothing.
> I found firefox 2.x and 3.0 can work but version 1.5 can not.
> Is there any difference of key db between firefox 3.0(2.x) and firefox
> 1.5?
I don't remember that far back too well. I'm sure there are many differences
in the bro
On Jul 30, 12:04 pm, Nelson B Bolyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > But when the browser doesn't have the private key, it should popup a
> > window said "The personal certificate can't be installed because you
> > do not own the corresponding private key which was create
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But when the browser doesn't have the private key, it should popup a
> window said "The personal certificate can't be installed because you
> do not own the corresponding private key which was created when the
> certificate was requested."
I agree.
> There is no any ac
On Jul 30, 11:06 am, Nelson B Bolyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I am a CA manager and I am trying to use Content-type:application/x-
> > x509-user-cert to support user importing certificate into firefox.
> > I now can import certificate on windows successfully but it
Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I am a CA manager and I am trying to use Content-type:application/x-
>> x509-user-cert to support user importing certificate into firefox.
>> I now can import certificate on windows successfully but it does not
>> work on linux machine.
>> Co
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am a CA manager and I am trying to use Content-type:application/x-
> x509-user-cert to support user importing certificate into firefox.
> I now can import certificate on windows successfully but it does not
> work on linux machine.
> Could anyone give me suggestion abo
Dear All,
I am a CA manager and I am trying to use Content-type:application/x-
x509-user-cert to support user importing certificate into firefox.
I now can import certificate on windows successfully but it does not
work on linux machine.
Could anyone give me suggestion about this issue?
Thank you
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> The requirement to put all cryptographically sensitive information into a
> well defined crypto boundary seems very elegant. It explains how NSS was
> able to work with so many third party crypto gizmos starting in the late
> 90's, and how it was
Rainer Gerhards wrote, On 2008-07-29 03:41 PDT:
> I am stepping in as a TLS-newbe who a few weeks ago selected to start
> a project with GnuTLS over NSS because there is very little
> *documentation* inside NSS that tells how to get started on a simple
> system that does not involve in-depth knowl
> -Original Message-
> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> la.org] On Behalf Of Nelson B Bolyard
> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 1:41 PM
> To: mozilla's crypto code discussion list
> Subject: Re: Question about JSS FIPS compliance
> How is software like Sun's Java JCE
Wan-Teh Chang wrote, On 2008-07-29 09:51:
> NSS treats its own software crypto module (softoken) as a
> PKCS #11 module.
... because it IS a PKCS#11 module. :)
> NSS calls the functions of a PKCS #11
> module through function pointers. Here is an example:
> http://mxr.mozilla.org/security/sour
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So the question I have is really that the JSS source code does not
> appear to actually call any FC_ functions. If that really is the case
> then is JSS really a FIPS compliant implementation? Or, more likely,
> the JSS code rea
On Jul 28, 6:47 pm, Nelson B Bolyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dean wrote, On 2008-07-28 13:50:
>
>
>
> > If an application wants to claim FIPS compliance does it have to be
> > implemented following all the guidelines set out in the FIPS certified
> > applications Security Policy document?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> la.org] On Behalf Of Nelson B Bolyard
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 6:48 PM
> To: mozilla's crypto code discussion list
> Subject: Re: Question about JSS FIPS compliance
> JSS also provides an interface for pu
> -Original Message-
> The requirement to put all cryptographically sensitive
> information into a
> well defined crypto boundary seems very elegant. It explains
> how NSS was
> able to work with so many third party crypto gizmos starting
> in the late
> 90's, and how it was able to get
On Jul 27, 2:17 am, Nelson Bolyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Daniel Stenberg wrote, On 2008-07-26 13:45:
>
> > As a user of OpenSSL, NSS, yassl and GnuTLS I can certainly agree that
> > GnuTLS has flaws in its API but NSS most certainly also has flaws as well
> > _and_ notable missing features t
17 matches
Mail list logo
