http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2008/06/12/ssl_certificates_vulnerable_to_openssl_flaw_on_debian.html
The last paragraph says:
=
Although a number of certificate authorities have offered free
replacement certificates to customers affected by the Debian OpenSSL
vulnerability, it has been r
On 6/12/2008 4:46 PM, Wan-Teh Chang wrote [in part]:
> If a company or school needs to issue a lot of certs to its internal
> servers, what is the recommended practice? I always thought the
> organization should operate an intermediate CA subordinate to a
> root CA. Isn't that the hierarchical m
Gervase Markham wrote:
> Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote:
>> Well, CRL can also be made to scale properly to handle a large number of
>> revocation, but this requires a few operationnal changes.
>
> ...which presumably have to be made before you issue the certs?
Yes, but the reason why only 20% of the
Nelson B Bolyard:
> On your system, is certutil a shell script that runs a program named
> certutil-bin ?
As Eddy said about getting it from a directory server install, the
Directory/Certificate System products have been doing that for quite a
while now.
>From a system with Red Hat CS 7.1 instal
4 matches
Mail list logo
