Nelson Bolyard wrote:
>I'd like to get a dependency tools for Windows again. I guess there's one as
>part of Mozilla, but I don't want to have to build the whole browser to get a
>dependency tool.
>
>
While the Mozilla build system can build its own, I'm not sure NSS is up
to the task, speci
Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
>On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Even in depend builds, Mozilla's root makefile still automatically blows away
>>all of dist/include to avoid such problems... do dist/public and dist/private
>>need to be added to that list too?
>>
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Even in depend builds, Mozilla's root makefile still automatically blows
> away all of dist/include to avoid such problems... do dist/public and
> dist/private need to be added to that list too?
Yes, just add a comment to expl
Neil wrote, On 2008-02-24 03:15:
> Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure if it's still worth implementing the real fix now -- it is
>> easier to ask the affected people to blow away their dist/public/nss
>> directory in their build trees.
>>
>>
> Even in depend builds, Mozilla's root makefile s
Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
>I'm not sure if it's still worth implementing the real fix now -- it is easier
>to ask the affected people to blow away their dist/public/nss directory in
>their build trees.
>
>
Even in depend builds, Mozilla's root makefile still automatically blows
away all of dist/in
5 matches
Mail list logo