Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote:
> Well, you said: "If anyone wants to double-check my conclusions above
> please feel free; I could use some help with this."
>
> So I asked in reply what the time frame is...as *you* know, it takes
> quite some time to go through just the basic informations, ver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 2008-01-21 19:59:
> I need to know how to generate key pair and correspondingly prepare a
> CSR in PKCS#10 format using NSS.
Does the tag do what you want?
___
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
Hello people,
I need to know how to generate key pair and correspondingly prepare a
CSR in PKCS#10 format using NSS.
I want to develop the same as a component in firefox.
the crypto objects inf firefox helps us to generate the CRMF
request..all that is fine.but I need it in PKCS#10 forma
skleinei wrote, On 2008-01-17 09:44:
> [...] Here are the basics:
>
> First of all, I am using version 2.0.0.11. The following parameters
> might be of interest:security.enable_ssl2=false,
> security.enable_ssl3=true, security.enable_tls=true
> The error I am getting after a few clicks or reloads
Frank Hecker wrote:
> Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote:
>
>> What's the time frame for this?
>>
>
> Time frame for what? I plan to work intensively on EV requests this
> week, and get as many as I can on the path to approval as soon as I can.
OK
>
> So if you have comments, either gen
Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote:
> What's the time frame for this?
Time frame for what? I plan to work intensively on EV requests this
week, and get as many as I can on the path to approval as soon as I can.
So if you have comments, either general or on any of the specific
requests, please
What's the time frame for this? I've seen already a few things worth
commenting, but thought after your first message to follow up on it
after you are ready...
Frank Hecker wrote:
> Frank Hecker wrote:
>
>> The first step is getting a complete list of all
>> current EV-related CA requests. I
Frank Hecker wrote:
> Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote:
>
>> Concerning this request I'd like to know a little bit more about the
>> physical protection requirements of the current and future sub CAs
>> according to what was stated at the bug. I've been reading the
>> information (and document
Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote:
> As per your comment 61
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335197#c61 how did you
> establish the audit performed by the Korean Ministry of Information and
> Communication to be equivalent to the Webtrust (assuming AICPA)
> criteria?
This was state
Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote:
> Concerning this request I'd like to know a little bit more about the
> physical protection requirements of the current and future sub CAs
> according to what was stated at the bug. I've been reading the
> information (and documents) mentioned in comment 12
> h
Frank Hecker wrote:
> The first step is getting a complete list of all
> current EV-related CA requests. I believe the following is the complete
> list, based on searching bugzilla:
Here's a quick take on each request. The principal parameters I looked
for are as follows:
* Is this request for
Hi Frank,
Concerning this request I'd like to know a little bit more about the
physical protection requirements of the current and future sub CAs
according to what was stated at the bug. I've been reading the
information (and documents) mentioned in comment 12
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show
Hi Frank,
Having had a look at this request last summer and followed the entries
of Gerv I wanted to ask you some quick question before investing more
time on this...
As per your comment 61
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335197#c61 how did you
establish the audit performed by th
I've been very remiss in sorting through the various CA requests to have
their roots enabled for EV use (or to add new EV-enabled roots), for
which I apologize. I'm now pushing to work through these requests as
soon as possible. The first step is getting a complete list of all
current EV-relate
14 matches
Mail list logo
