On Dec 15, 11:01 pm, Nelson Bolyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I think not. In a world where non-signed email is discarded, and all
> spam is signed, the verified sender identity becomes a basis for the
> user to impose reputation filters of their own. Spam me, and I filter
> out all future em
On Dec 15, 6:45 pm, "Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel, sorry to be interruptive, but let me clarify this...your system
> has (almost) nothing to do with identity validation, signing and
> encryption and is all about fighting spam. Am I correct with this
> assumption?
Daniel Dreymann wrote, On 2007-12-15 17:26:
> The token includes a hash of the message (submitted to us by the
> sender), hence each the token is unique and valid for one specific
> message only.
I see. So it's also a form of rate control, traffic shaping.
> The entire body and selected headers
On Dec 15, 2007 4:15 PM, Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> GCC got more strict over the years, compiling for last 10 years doesn't make
> your code correct at all. Even with gcc 4.3 we have some new rules for C++
> programs.
Let's work on this bug in the NSS bug report:
https://bugzilla
Daniel, sorry to be interruptive, but let me clarify this...your system
has (almost) nothing to do with identity validation, signing and
encryption and is all about fighting spam. Am I correct with this
assumption?
Daniel Dreymann wrote:
--
Regards
Signer: Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd.
Daniel Dreymann wrote:
>
> The accreditation is done once (like a CA) but, unlike a CA, we stay
> in the loop: we control usage (we dispense the tokens) and monitor
> complaints in real time (feeds from the mailbox providers) so we can
> take immediate action and shut down a compromised sender.
Li
Nelson Bolyard wrote:
> Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote, On 2007-12-13 03:32:
>
>> Oh wellmaybe I'll come of with yet another standard:
>> StartComVerySecureAndGoodEVCompatibleSSL/SMIME
>>
>
> I think that's a great idea, Eddy. Now you just need to do the one
> extra thing that Goodma
On Dec 15, 3:37 pm, Nelson Bolyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Daniel Dreymann wrote, On 2007-12-14 14:41:
>
> > The embedded certificate is only a tool. CertifiedEmail is a third-
> > party signature system. First we accredit senders to establish wether
> > they are good players with a good email
Steffen Schulz wrote, On 2007-12-12 10:34:
> On 071209 at 03:55, Nelson Bolyard wrote:
>> If FF doesn't have any built-in UI for SRP, I think I have a harder time
>> justifying the inclusion of SRP in NSS. I think it's a feature that
>> would be included exclusively for use in the browser, so if t
On Dec 15, 7:04 am, Michael Ströder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Dreymann wrote:
>
> > CertifiedEmail is a third- party signature system. First we accredit
> > senders to establish wether they are good players with a good email
> > reputation. Then, once they are accredited, we certify *indi
Sunday 16 December 2007 02:02:48 tarihinde Nelson Bolyard şunları yazmıştı:
> Ismail Dönmez wrote, On 2007-12-14 14:49:
> > Friday 14 December 2007 04:09:45 tarihinde Nelson Bolyard şunları
yazmıştı:
> >> Ismail Dönmez wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Over at Novell bugzilla [0] its reported that
Ismail Dönmez wrote, On 2007-12-14 14:49:
> Friday 14 December 2007 04:09:45 tarihinde Nelson Bolyard şunları yazmıştı:
>> Ismail Dönmez wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Over at Novell bugzilla [0] its reported that nss fails to build with gcc
>>> 4.3 . GCC developer Richard Guenther identified that
>>>
Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote, On 2007-12-13 03:32:
> Oh wellmaybe I'll come of with yet another standard:
> StartComVerySecureAndGoodEVCompatibleSSL/SMIME
I think that's a great idea, Eddy. Now you just need to do the one
extra thing that GoodmailSystems did: get the webmail providers to
Michael Ströder wrote:
> Daniel Dreymann wrote:
>
>> CertifiedEmail is a third- party signature system. First we accredit
>> senders to establish wether they are good players with a good email
>> reputation. Then, once they are accredited, we certify *individual*
>> messages,
>>
>
> But thi
Daniel Dreymann wrote, On 2007-12-14 14:41:
> The embedded certificate is only a tool. CertifiedEmail is a third-
> party signature system. First we accredit senders to establish wether
> they are good players with a good email reputation. Then, once they
> are accredited, we certify *individual*
Daniel Dreymann wrote:
>
> CertifiedEmail is a third- party signature system. First we accredit
> senders to establish wether they are good players with a good email
> reputation. Then, once they are accredited, we certify *individual*
> messages,
But this initial accreditation is done once.
> i
* Robert Relyea:
>>> I've seen proposals for this kind of gateway back in the early 90's as
>>> a way of providing secure email access for browsers which did not
>>> support https:.
>>>
>>
>> IIRC, Netscape 3 or 4 had some kind of "extend trust to proxies" option.
>>
> Not when it comes to
17 matches
Mail list logo
