No other success stories?
Are there really no other readers of this list using their own personal
crypto devices for reading/writing signed and/or encrypted email?
Maybe NSS is way overkill for the needs of mozilla users?
___
dev-tech-crypto mailing lis
Hi All,
I don't know if any of you following this list are interested in new
standards for on-line provisioning of PKI. In case you are, you may
contact me regarding the specification of a scheme that is intended
to eventually replace the hodgepodge of sub-standard and entirely
proprietary scheme
Geoff,
Just wanted to provide some additional info to Bob's reply.
There are three ways to configure NSS in the FIPS mode.
In our FIPS Security Policy, we describe the low-level method
for people who use only the NSS software cryptographic
module (i.e., libsoftokn3.so/softokn3.dll only).
Most of
I had read the security policy and thought that was the case. Seemed too
easy so I just wanted confirmation.
Thanks
Geoff
-Original Message-
From: Robert Relyea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 2:31 PM
To: Gatfield, Geoffrey
Cc: dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.o
Gatfield, Geoffrey wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on converting our server to FIPS compliance. We provide user
authentication using LDAP (with Mozilla LDAP C SDK) which uses NSS. To
provide FIPS compliance can we just replace the NSS library with the
FIPS compliant version? Does NSS automatically
5 matches
Mail list logo
