David Stutzman wrote:
> Robert Relyea wrote:
>
>>> The JSS method to create this is:
>>> SignerInfo(SignerIdentifier signerIdentifier, SET signedAttributes,
>>> SET unsignedAttributes, OBJECT_IDENTIFIER contentType, byte[]
>>> messageDigest, SignatureAlgorithm signingAlg, PrivateKey signingKey
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:04:09 -0700, Nelson Bolyard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote a long response to your posting, and then noticed something
> that may be a much shorter solution, so I'll ask about it first,
> and if that doesn't solve the problem, I'll send the longer tome.
>
> You wrote:
David Stutzman wrote:
Robert Relyea wrote:
The JSS method to create this is:
SignerInfo(SignerIdentifier signerIdentifier, SET signedAttributes,
SET unsignedAttributes, OBJECT_IDENTIFIER contentType, byte[]
messageDigest, SignatureAlgorithm signingAlg, PrivateKey signingKey)
So j
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've been hitting a strange error when trying to use NSS tools with
> the certificates databases in Mozilla (mainly XULRunner, but I got the
> same result in Firefox).
Be very sure that no mozilla apps are running when you copy the cert
and/or key DBs, or you will get co
Romain,
I wrote a long response to your posting, and then noticed something
that may be a much shorter solution, so I'll ask about it first,
and if that doesn't solve the problem, I'll send the longer tome.
You wrote:
> Now try to create a sign jar:
> - signtool -dA -kZ -p... -Zcommon.jar test.d
Robert Relyea wrote:
>> The JSS method to create this is:
>> SignerInfo(SignerIdentifier signerIdentifier, SET signedAttributes,
>> SET unsignedAttributes, OBJECT_IDENTIFIER contentType, byte[]
>> messageDigest, SignatureAlgorithm signingAlg, PrivateKey signingKey)
>>
> So just passing agentPr
David Stutzman wrote:
PK11PrivKey tempAgentKey = null;
try {
tempAgentKey =
PK11PrivKey.fromPrivateKeyInfo(agentPrivateKey.getEncoded(),
cm.getInternalCryptoToken());
}
catch (TokenException ex) { //handle exception }
This works fine. This morning I used a hardware toke
Nelson Bolyard wrote:
>
> $18/year is too expensive, eh?
>
Heh, this is true. My attempts to find cheap SSL certificates had only
yielded $100/per year jobs. Given that they are not that expensive I
have started doing a straw poll of authors to see whether that would be
too much or not.
Dave
Dave Townsend wrote:
> Hi all, I am looking for some feedback on a proposal I'm working on to
> improve the security of add-on updates in Mozilla products. Let me give
> an overview of the problem I wish to solve and then what I have come up
> with so far as a potential solution.
>
> In the Mozill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I go into into my profile directory, I am able to view it
> using signtool. It gives the following output :
>
> Object signing certificates
> ---
> Common Name - Organization
> Issued by: Common Name - Organization (Common Nam
Ahryman40k wrote:
> But i have another problem when trying to use my component from a web page
> :s
> I think it is a security issue because javascript can use it when executed
> from local with a security alert, but nothing works when executed from web.
> At the beginning, i was thinked that sig
11 matches
Mail list logo