Venkata Udaybhaskar Nori wrote:
> I need to build nss for a 64 bit machine.
> I was able to build it on most of the 32 bit machines.
> Now I need it to build it on a 64 bit RHEL machine.
> Curious to know if it makes any difference.
> Please help me out.
NSS 3.11 should build fine for 64-bit Inte
Hi,
I need to build nss for a 64 bit machine.
I was able to build it on most of the 32 bit machines.
Now I need it to build it on a 64 bit RHEL machine.
Curious to know if it makes any difference.
Please help me out.
--
Regards,
Venkata Udaybhaskar Nori
_
Has anyone used SWIG to create an NSS wrapper for perl, python, or other
languages? I would really, really, really like to use NSS for crypto
in my scripts, but invariably the only supported crypto is openssl.
SWIG could even be used to create a Java wrapper, possibly making JSS
support easie
Other (with the subject associated) views on the usability of TLS:
http://www.openoces.org/pipermail/developer/2004-December/000582.html
I think they may be on to something here.
==
We seem to need another browser-based PKI client-auth mechanism.
==
Kyle,
It seems that you are saying that MSIE caches PIN-codes because that
is a prerequisite in order to silently reuse a smart-card based private key.
If this is indeed the case, do you also claim that this caching is independent
on who (=domain) is asking?
Although plausible, I find this slightl
(I'm going to send this reply back to the dev-tech-crypto list, as it
is a situation which is sorely misunderstood by many people. Please
pardon my alarm, but the fact that a member of the ACM misunderstood
the situation suggests to me that it's a wider problem in
understanding than most people wi
6 matches
Mail list logo
