> However, do see Brian Smith's recent proposal on this topic:
> https://briansmith.org/referrer-01.html
This looks extremely reasonable. Is there any reason not to adopt this
in Servo and see if it works?
jack.
___
dev-servo mailing list
dev-servo@list
I don't see any, however since Servo isn't being dogfooded yet, there's not
much data we can gather on this (yet).
Still, it would be interesting to hide a bunch of "useful" web platform
features behind some flags, add some specific reporting/logging, and see
how many of them are really needed (an
On 04/02/15 14:57, Manish Goregaokar wrote:
> I don't see any, however since Servo isn't being dogfooded yet, there's not
> much data we can gather on this (yet).
>
> Still, it would be interesting to hide a bunch of "useful" web platform
> features behind some flags, add some specific reporting/l
Last year I claimed that Servo had a number of huge stacks, as
reported by /proc//smaps. It turns out that these measurements
are inaccurate -- if a non-stack mapping gets placed next to a stack
mapping, the kernel merges them and the merged segment is marked as a
stack. I've confirmed this happens
4 matches
Mail list logo
