On 5/26/14 3:11 PM, Simon Sapin wrote:
I’m fine with that, but I’m more interested in the signature than the
naming. That is, which of these (or others) to have, for each private
field?
fn(&self) -> T
fn(&mut self, T)
fn(&'a mut self) -> &'a mut T
Hmm. My gut tells me the first and the third.
On 27/05/2014 18:14, Patrick Walton wrote:
On 5/26/14 3:11 PM, Simon Sapin wrote:
I’m fine with that, but I’m more interested in the signature than the
naming. That is, which of these (or others) to have, for each private
field?
fn(&self) -> T
fn(&mut self, T)
fn(&'a mut self) -> &'a mut T
Hm
On 5/27/14 11:04 AM, Simon Sapin wrote:
On 27/05/2014 18:14, Patrick Walton wrote:
On 5/26/14 3:11 PM, Simon Sapin wrote:
I’m fine with that, but I’m more interested in the signature than the
naming. That is, which of these (or others) to have, for each private
field?
fn(&self) -> T
fn(&mut se
3 matches
Mail list logo
