(From your next message it sounds like there's no disagreement here, but I
wanted to get the reasoning written down)
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 6:36 AM, Anthony Ramine wrote:
> I would much rather prefer if we just checked that we didn't use the Debug
> impls of large types.
The issue here is tha
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018, at 1:36 AM, Anthony Ramine wrote:
> I would much rather prefer if we just checked that we didn't use the
> Debug impls of large types. We could also just not derive them in
> release mode.
>
> In the PR you link, AFAICT you also removed some uses that were just
> very smal
That being said, looking at nsCSSParser.cpp in Gecko, I just realised you never
had similar code (printing values when some invariant is broken). Given how old
Gecko is, I guess that means this is not even useful to begin with (I mean the
printing you removed was not useful to begin with, just t
I would much rather prefer if we just checked that we didn't use the Debug
impls of large types. We could also just not derive them in release mode.
In the PR you link, AFAICT you also removed some uses that were just very small
enums or even integers, which may not be necessary.
> Le 13 janv.
At least for Servo, should we add a check to tidy (
https://github.com/servo/servo/blob/master/python/tidy/servo_tidy/tidy.py)
immediately to catch the use of that fairly-unique formatting string, as we
do for a bunch of other random stuff? We can always exempt particular
files/folder where we thin
5 matches
Mail list logo
