I'm ok with that, especially given that's what I intend to do with my
independent looking into how we could improve the SM vendoring situation
(except that the top-level crate in my case is an unpublishable tool for
handling the rest of the repo).
> Le 11 janv. 2020 à 00:35, Josh Matthews a éc
Correct.
On 2020-01-10 6:23 p.m., Alan Jeffrey wrote:
Would the idea be to have two top-level dirs, `mozjs` and `mozjs_sys` each
of which has its own `Cargo.toml`? So the crates would be the same, it's
just the repos that are merging?
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:31 AM Manish Goregaokar
wrote:
Would the idea be to have two top-level dirs, `mozjs` and `mozjs_sys` each
of which has its own `Cargo.toml`? So the crates would be the same, it's
just the repos that are merging?
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:31 AM Manish Goregaokar
wrote:
> This seems good to me.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020, 9:59
This seems good to me.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020, 9:59 PM Josh Matthews wrote:
> Given how closely intertwined the two repositories are, and especially
> given we can no longer publish them to crates.io and have a pinned git
> revision in rust-mozjs's Cargo.toml, I propose that we merge the
> servo/
4 matches
Mail list logo
