ect: Re: [dev-servo] Safe abstractions for unique handles
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Patrick Walton wrote:
> Right, that's been on our mind as well. We try to use channels and ports
> wherever we can. In general channels and ports are better than IDs in every
> way: they cannot be f
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Patrick Walton wrote:
> Right, that's been on our mind as well. We try to use channels and ports
> wherever we can. In general channels and ports are better than IDs in every
> way: they cannot be forged and have better memory management properties (as
> integer I
On 7/15/13 4:32 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
A minor random thought related to that design:
Using integer IDs, as Gecko does, raises the possibility of a bug,
possibly even a security bug, where a rogue IFRAME is able to render
itself at the wrong place in the tree. In Gecko, preventing a
compro
A minor random thought related to that design:
Using integer IDs, as Gecko does, raises the possibility of a bug, possibly
even a security bug, where a rogue IFRAME is able to render itself at the
wrong place in the tree. In Gecko, preventing a compromised process from
doing an attack like that re
4 matches
Mail list logo
