On 08/08/2013 12:05 PM, Devdatta Akhawe wrote:
A bunch of the discussion seems to be about how prevalent things like
document.domain, cross-origin iframes, and other weirdness are.
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/helenw/papers/incoherencyAndWebAnalyzer.pdf
is a paper that tried t
2013/8/9 Tetsuharu OHZEKI :
> Why I defined `handle_htmlelement!` is that `handle_element!` create
> object which cannot handle the case of simple `HTMLElement`.
I'm sorry. I made a typo. This is:
Why I defined `handle_htmlelement!` is that `handle_element!` cannot
handle the case of simple `HTMLE
2013/8/9 Boris Zbarsky :
> Note that there are other cases where multiple element types all use the
> same interface that's not HTMLElement (e.g. and ). So we
> want support for that sort of thing.
For its purpose, I feel we can use `handle_element!` macro simply in
/src/components/script/html/h
On 8/8/13 8:18 PM, Josh Matthews wrote:
On a related note, saneyuki added support for some element types that
don't have their own interfaces and just use HTMLElement.
Note that there are other cases where multiple element types all use the
same interface that's not HTMLElement (e.g. and ).
I'd like to thank everyone who's been contributing to this - the
response has been overwhelming, and I'm thrilled at how fast we're
burning through the list. I added a bunch of new entries to it today,
since it turns out that our element types are quite incomplete; feel
free to tackle those as
https://github.com/mozilla/servo/wiki/JS-objects,-wrappers,-and-cross-origin-concerns-2013-08-07
kmc: when you compute the closure, do you need to use the public suffix list?
jst: we have a list of ETLDs in gecko. (co.uk, etc). i don't know where the
list comes from.
That list is maintained a
A bunch of the discussion seems to be about how prevalent things like
document.domain, cross-origin iframes, and other weirdness are.
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/helenw/papers/incoherencyAndWebAnalyzer.pdf
is a paper that tried to measure this sort of weird behavior with, IIRC,
That seems like what we want to do, yes.
Cheers,
Josh
On 08/08/2013 08:54 AM, Tetsuharu OHZEKI wrote:
Good question. I've noticed this with a few elements we define (like
HTMLItalicElement, HTMLStrongElement, etc). According to
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/section
> Good question. I've noticed this with a few elements we define (like
> HTMLItalicElement, HTMLStrongElement, etc). According to
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/sections.html#the-section-element,
> uses HTMLElement (as do the other ones I mentioned), so it looks
> li
9 matches
Mail list logo
