On 2/14/13 5:33 PM, Brian Anderson wrote:
* FFI stack switching - https://github.com/mozilla/servo/issues/278
* FFI virtual calls - https://github.com/mozilla/servo/issues/278
* DOM representation - https://github.com/mozilla/servo/issues/280
* string representation - https://github.com/mozilla/s
On 02/13/2013 07:55 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 2/13/13 10:16 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 2/13/13 9:47 PM, Brian Anderson wrote:
I haven't actually created a DOM-related milestone yet because we
haven't come up with a goal that I'm satisfied with ("create working
dom
bindings" is vague). Thin
On 02/14/2013 05:18 AM, Josh Matthews wrote:
Patrick convinced me that I should work in public, so here's the
branch in which I'm banging away at the bindings codegen:
https://github.com/jdm/servo/commits/codegen . This is the current
output so far: https://github.com/jdm/servo/wiki/Codegen-out
On 2/13/13 11:19 PM, Patrick Walton wrote:
Servo now ships a known-working version of Rust, so it should be easier
to build.
OK. I've spent about 3 hours so far on that today. So far there were
two build system bugs that had to get fixed just so that I could get out
of configure, a non-buil
Patrick convinced me that I should work in public, so here's the branch
in which I'm banging away at the bindings codegen:
https://github.com/jdm/servo/commits/codegen . This is the current
output so far: https://github.com/jdm/servo/wiki/Codegen-output
I don't recommend attempting to reproduc
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
> For example, Rust can't, in general, stop you from writing "if (!x)" instead
> of "if (x)" like I did in a recent NSS bug.
Depending on what 'x' is and how it was obtained it's possible it
could be stopped. If it's a null pointer check for e
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
> 3. Will that thing support Flash or any other plugins?
>
Definitely not.
I think there is no doubt that Rust on its own brings a lot of security
> advantages to a browser-like thing based on Servo. But, as the design
> document notes, ther
Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> I thought we were going to rely on Rust's
> isolation mechanisms for this kind of finer-grained isolation. I
> thought that was a big part of the point of introducing Rust in the
> first place
Let's make the assumption that some future web browser-like thing, intended f
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Luke Wagner wrote:
> > Eventually I can imagine writing the JIT in Rust and using some kind of
> certified
> > compilation to guard against compiler bugs.
>
> I haven't really followed this topic; do you really think this would be a
> feasible approach to a produc
9 matches
Mail list logo
