Re: Building mozilla-central with clang + icecream

2017-11-07 Thread paul
ice mk_add_options 'export RUSTC_WRAPPER=sccache' mk_add_options 'export CARGO_INCREMENTAL=1' ``` Cheers, Paul. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Firefox build (Nightly) thread with root permission

2014-03-31 Thread Paul
Hi, I have created a new thread in Nightly and the function can be launched while I executed the script: ./mach run Q1: Because my function is related to kernel, root privilege is necessary. Hence, I got the error message as shown in the following: root privileges needed to run this function

Re: Firefox build (Nightly) thread with root permission

2014-03-31 Thread Paul
Hey BDS, Thanks for your reply. 1. The function I mentioned is the new code I added. 2. I understand that running Firefox with root privileges is not encouraged. However, due to my experiment is related to kernel, root privileges will be necessary to my program. I wiped out my code which was

Re: Firefox build (Nightly) thread with root permission

2014-04-01 Thread Paul
Hi, When I added code with a function udev_monitor_new_from_socket(), the Nightly stops executing everything while this function returns an error fd. I strongly suspect this happens due to the permission issue while Nightly does not allow me to gain root privileges. However, this is necessary

Re: Firefox build (Nightly) thread with root permission

2014-04-05 Thread Paul
Hi Mike, Thanks for your advice. I will definitely take your suggestion. The experiment I am currently doing is to run some functions related to udevadm on Nightly. The function udev_monitor_new_from_socket() I added in Nightly did not work while this works well on my another Firefox OS device

Re: Firefox build (Nightly) thread with root permission

2014-04-06 Thread Paul
Alex Jordan於 2014年4月6日星期日UTC+8下午1時23分04秒寫道: > On Apr 5, 2014 6:55 AM, "Paul" wrote: > > > That's why I tried to obtain root privileges on Nightly. If there is > > another way to make this work without gaining root permission, that will be > > great. >

firefox os UMS mode (usb mass storage)

2014-05-01 Thread Paul
Here are some questions about UMS: 1. Does Firefox os still support UMS? I play around the emulator but there are no option available in settings/media storage--> enable usb mass storage here. 2. If so, what UMS has? Does it include sdcard free space and internal ram? 3. how does it work in Gec

firefox acts as a host

2014-05-05 Thread Paul
Hi, I knew that Firefox can act in UMS mode which means Firefox can act as a gadget. Since Firefox will not not be only running on cell phone, can firefox acts as a host? In the host mode, the system can detect other plugged usb sticks and use it as a mass storage. Please provide your feedbac

Re: What are the most important new APIs to document in Q3/Q4?

2014-06-26 Thread paul
he changes that go in, that should help to have good docs). Cheers, Paul. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Is there a way to improve partial compilation times?

2017-03-09 Thread Paul Adenot
mpiler flag > (-fdebug-compilation-dir), > do you have any detailed information (or thread) that talking about this? If found this yesterday after setting up the cluster in Paris. I might take a shot at fixing it. Cheers, Paul. ___ dev-platfo

Firefox Security Team Newsletter Q2 2017

2017-08-08 Thread Paul Theriault
I posted this to dev-security already, but received suggestions to bring our newsletter to dev-platform as well. I believe this list is plaintext, so instead of pasting broken content, I'll encourage you to read the online version here: https://wiki.mozilla.org/SecurityEngineering/Newsletter Or be

Security Principles for coding secure IPC

2017-10-30 Thread Paul Theriault
m and others for their input and review. Feedback, corrections, suggestions all welcome. Regards, Paul Theriault Firefox Security Assurance ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Firefox Security Team Newsletter Q3 17

2017-11-02 Thread Paul Theriault
For anyone who clicked the link and was confused, NOW the wiki has the latest newsletter. Apologies for that. https://wiki.mozilla.org/SecurityEngineering/Newsletter On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:26 PM, wrote: > [ See formatted version here: https://wiki.mozilla.org/ > SecurityEngineering/Newsletter

diverging Servo' Browser API from Gecko' Browser API?

2015-11-12 Thread Paul Rouget
events. But the Gecko/Gaia compatibility will slow us down. If we don't really care about keeping the compatibility between gecko and servo, do we want to rename the events/API (mozbrowser could be renamed to something else)? If we care about the compatibility, what could be the proper way to

Re: HTML-based chrome and

2016-02-25 Thread Paul Rouget
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Benjamin Francis wrote: > So my proposal is a chrome-only element for Gecko which > would replace the mozApps-only mozBrowser API > , > along the lines of Electron's element >

Re: HTML-based chrome and

2016-02-25 Thread Paul Rouget
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Benjamin Francis wrote: > My first priority is a Webview API for Gecko that works without > mozApps on multiple platforms. Is that about coming up with a new and better way to offer privileges (security model)? If so - yes, the Electron approach sounds like the be

Re: HTML-based chrome and

2016-02-26 Thread Paul Rouget
So there are 2 things here. Browser API change. Sure, what do you propose? I don't care too much about the final syntax. But there are things we can improve in the current API. See https://github.com/browserhtml/browserhtml/issues/639 for some ideas. A Electron-like project. I don't think there's

Re: HTML-based chrome and

2016-02-26 Thread Paul Rouget
> > A Electron-like project. I don't think there's anybody who would think > > that having a Electron-compatible tool based on gecko is a bad idea > > (we will likely go this route with Servo). I'm just not sure we have > > the resources to work on something like that *today* though. > I don't buy

Re: HTML-based chrome and

2016-02-28 Thread Paul Rouget
> With regard to Servo: I’d recommend to request info about the Browser.html > project; it’s something that Paul Rouget bootstrapped, but I haven’t heard > anything about it in a long, long time. Yeah. We've been busy migrating from Gecko to Servo. Now we have a chance to

Re: Intent to enable e10s by default when running tests locally

2016-03-24 Thread Paul Adenot
Do we know whether `set follow-fork-mode child` in gdb would work ? If not, can we fix it ? It would be a pretty good experience for most developers that only care about the child. Paul. On Thu, Mar 24, 2016, at 06:05 PM, Aaron Klotz wrote: > I know that most people aren't debugging

WebRTC connections do not trigger content policies. Should they?

2016-06-17 Thread Paul Ellenbogen
of including WebRTC connections in content policies? Paul Ellenbogen ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: WebRTC connections do not trigger content policies. Should they?

2016-06-18 Thread Paul Ellenbogen
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote: > Data channels are modeled on web sockets, and I see we do this for web > sockets. https://bugzil.la/692067 > > However, data channels are typically opened to other *clients*, not > servers. > While WebRTC is typically used to connect be

Re: WebRTC connections do not trigger content policies. Should they?

2016-06-24 Thread Paul Ellenbogen
I think you are right. I asked on the Easy List forum and didn't get any compelling reason WebRTC could be blocked from advertisers. Advertisers would be able to do what you describe to allow for harder to block dynamic IPs. As you said elsewhere,

Re: Enabling seccomp-bpf for content process on nightly Linux desktop

2016-07-05 Thread Paul Theriault
e information from b2g that has some information. https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Sandbox/Seccomp#Use_in_Gecko We will update to make this Linux specific instead of b2g. Thanks, Paul ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Rationalising Linux audio backend support

2016-07-14 Thread Paul Adenot
lso I support this proposal. Cheers, Paul. [0]: http://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/components/telemetry/Histograms.json#105 On Thu, Jul 14, 2016, at 09:32 AM, Jet Villegas wrote: > I generally support reducing the support matrix for Linux PCM audio. > > A quick searc

Re: NS_WARN_IF_FALSE has been renamed NS_WARNING_ASSERTION

2016-09-22 Thread Paul Adenot
ash? I think you can do that with telemetry, we do that, for example, when we encounter a severe failure when trying to open audio devices [0], trying to get a sense of how frequent it is in the field. Cheer, Paul. [0]: http://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/dom/media/Gr

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Audio Working Group

2016-10-26 Thread Paul Adenot
io API, lighter involvement with Web MIDI). Thanks, Paul. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Hardening the Firefox Sandbox

2016-12-01 Thread Paul Theriault
the Platform Integration team on Friday 1pm [3]. Thanks, Paul [1] https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Sandbox/Process_model <https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Sandbox/Process_model> [2] https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Sandbox/Hardening <https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Sandbox/Har

Re: menu handling .. nice to have

2013-03-07 Thread Paul Rouget
level? (on osx at least) -- Paul ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reparenting a XulRunnner window in a Firefox Window

2013-07-02 Thread Paul Rouget
s and Mac. Any idea if this is something doable with Windows and Mac? Would there be any better approach? [1] http://tronche.com/gui/x/xlib/window-and-session-manager/XReparentWindow.html -- Paul ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozill

Re: Reparenting a XulRunnner window in a Firefox Window

2013-07-03 Thread Paul Rouget
mess with > that. It's actually what I do on Linux. A plugin that reparents an existing window. Is that possible with Windows and Mac? > > Jim > > -Original Message- From: Paul Rouget > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 10:34 AM > To: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org &g

Re: Reparenting a XulRunnner window in a Firefox Window

2013-07-03 Thread Paul Rouget
Jim Mathies wrote: > You could do that on Windows, although it would be a bit of a hack. > I don't think it's something we would consider checking into the > tree. I would be part of the simulator code (addon). > -Original Message- From: Paul Rouget > Sent: Wedn

Re: Reparenting a XulRunnner window in a Firefox Window

2013-07-11 Thread Paul Rouget
Gijs Kruitbosch wrote: > On 02/07/13 17:34 , Paul Rouget wrote: > >The Firefox OS Simulator is a XulRunner instance run > >from Firefox. Two processes, two windows, two different > >version of gecko. > > > >It would be very useful if we could display the simulato

padding/margin/border/content highlighting (need platform help)

2013-08-28 Thread Paul Rouget
nyone help? (maybe mentor me?) - is there any better way than using the computed style + getBoundClientRect? Maybe we can expose the layout info to nsIDOMWindowUtils, or maybe we can highlight these regions directly at the gecko level. -- Paul ___ de

Re: padding/margin/border/content highlighting (need platform help)

2013-08-28 Thread Paul Rouget
Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Paul Rouget wrote: > > > - is there any better way than using the computed style + > > getBoundClientRect? > > Maybe we can expose the layout info to nsIDOMWindowUtils, or maybe we can > > high

Re: padding/margin/border/content highlighting (need platform help)

2013-08-29 Thread Paul Rouget
some WebIDL codegen > changes in bug 854490. But maybe your needs are just the impetus we need to > get this done. Understood. Showing these "boxes" is one of the most requested feature for the Firefox devtools. If there's anything

Re: Getting frame element

2013-09-20 Thread Paul Rouget
rames). > > So, for jsbin, it turns out one of the iframes being loaded is > considered as the top level window, even using its docShell. > > If anyone has any idea why that is, that would help me a lot! > Thanks > > Patrick -- Paul ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Getting frame element

2013-09-20 Thread Paul Rouget
lectorAll() and then go through all the frames to find which one owns the window. Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 9/20/13 12:24 PM, Paul Rouget wrote: > >@all: Is there a way to know which DOM element holds a docShell? Basically, > >which > > owns the docshell? > > We should

Re: Killing the Moz Audio Data API

2013-10-17 Thread Paul Adenot
Yes, I pinged him an hour ago, and he plans to replace all uses of Audio Data API by Web Audio. I think he posted in the bug. Paul. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: WebAudio popping

2014-02-03 Thread Paul Adenot
it, but I've got high-end audio equipment). I'm running Linux, but this code should be platform independent. Please get in touch on irc (#media, ping padenot) or file a bug in the Core :: Web Audio component, so we can fix it. Cheers, Paul. [1]: http://lists.w3.org/A

Re: Possible to make all (CSS) transitions 0/1ms to speed up FxOS Gaia tests?

2014-02-16 Thread Paul Rouget
DOMWindowUtils.idl#1264 -- Paul ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

ADB & devtools debugger changes - look-out for regressions

2014-04-23 Thread Paul Rouget
2G devices is also impacted. Please cc me (:paul) to any bug that you think might be related to these changes. -- Paul ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Linux Off-main-thread compositing (OMTC) enabled

2014-07-21 Thread Paul Rouget
php?id=44274684&tree=Mozilla-Inbound > https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/3b5e46a568f1 > ___ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform -- Paul __

Re: I want to implement a ListBox that contains one million(1,000,000) custom vbox, how to speed it up.

2014-08-01 Thread Paul Rouget
Yonggang Luo wrote: > The vbox's content comes from a large database. > > Is there any standard way to implement it A xul listbox? You probably want to use a treeview. It's designed for such use cases. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Tech/XUL/Tutorial/Custom_

Re: I am willing to getting treecell to rendering vbox/hbox inside. Where should I start?

2014-08-07 Thread Paul Rouget
p. > > ___ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform -- Paul ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: after NPAPI ?

2014-11-25 Thread Paul Adenot
time. Let me know if you want any more info, Paul. [0]: http://webaudio.github.io/web-audio-api/#the-audioworker [1]: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1062849 ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozill

Intent to implement and ship: StereoPannerNode

2014-11-26 Thread Paul Adenot
arget release: Firefox 37. Preference behind which this will be implemented: None. Cheers, Paul. [0]: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/blink-dev/IVDmh6ubHZM [1]: https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/372 ___ dev-platform ma

Re: Audio output device selector

2015-01-12 Thread Paul Adenot
Our audio output subsystem is not an XPCOM component, so I would say no. Paul. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Nested scrolling behavior

2015-01-20 Thread Paul Rouget
there a way to make #out scroll first, then #in? Not sure how relevant this is but: - APZC is enabled - #in is actually an -- Paul ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Nested scrolling behavior

2015-01-21 Thread Paul Rouget
Botond Ballo wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Paul Rouget wrote: > > Is it possible to make a container scroll before its child? > > > > Example: > > > > 2 nested divs. #out and #in. #in is inside #out. Both overflow. > > > > [...] > >

Re: Nested scrolling behavior

2015-01-21 Thread Paul Rouget
scroll anything. The iframe is still scrollable with the mouse. If I don't set #scrollable {overflow:scroll}, I come back to the original behavior (iframe scrolls first). Any idea? Paul Rouget wrote: > Botond Ballo wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Paul Rouget wrote: &

Re: Nested scrolling behavior

2015-01-21 Thread Paul Rouget
I managed to make my example work. So it must be a thing in my original code that doesn't play well with this. I'll investigate. Paul Rouget wrote: > I set scrollgrab on the container. > But now, I can't scroll anything. > > This is the layout: > > >//

Re: Nested scrolling behavior

2015-01-21 Thread Paul Rouget
t; height: 250px; > overflow: scroll; > } > > #in { > width: 200px; > height: 250px; > background-color: white; > overflow: scroll; > } > > h1 { > display: block; > height: 50px; > margin: 0; > } Scrolling with the mouse doesn't work. It wo

Re: Nested scrolling behavior

2015-01-21 Thread Paul Rouget
It has nothing to do with scrollgrab. Scrolling overflowing remote iframes doesn't work on osx + apzc. Paul Rouget wrote: > Apparently, the issue is when I use an iframe. > > My code: > > > > >hi > >http://paulrouget.com";> > > > >

Re: Intent to ship: CSS display:contents

2015-02-02 Thread paul . irish
Hey Mats, the use cases are not obvious to me, but I didn't follow the original www-style threads on this so I'm lacking context. (A the spec doesn't help either) Can you help explain why a developer would use `display:contents`? I think it'd help to have it described a bit. Thanks! _

APZC + onscroll

2015-02-24 Thread Paul Rouget
When is onscroll called if apzc is enabled? How often? When is the first scroll event fired? Will using onscroll prevent apzc to work properly? Thanks, -- Paul ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org

Re: APZC + onscroll

2015-02-25 Thread Paul Rouget
Thank you. On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:13 PM, wrote: > On Wednesday, February 25, 2015 at 2:40:12 AM UTC-5, Paul Rouget wrote: >> When is onscroll called if apzc is enabled? > > The scroll event is fired every time APZC sends a repaint request to the main > thread (which i

Syncing 2 scrolling operations

2015-02-26 Thread Paul Rouget
The picture above should help. -- Paul ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Syncing 2 scrolling operations

2015-03-01 Thread Paul Rouget
(forgot to cc dev.platform in my reply) On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Paul Rouget wrote: > Hi Kats. Thanks for taking a look at this. > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:21 PM, wrote: >> On Thursday, February 26, 2015 at 1:06:15 PM UTC-5, Paul Rouget wrote: >>> I

Re: Syncing 2 scrolling operations

2015-03-01 Thread Paul Rouget
(forgot to cc dev.platform in my reply) On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 3:47 AM, Paul Rouget wrote: >> So in order to implement the behaviour you're looking for we would >> definitely need to make some changes in gecko. > > How much work is that? Is it just a matter of "

Intent to deprecate: doppler computation in the PannerNode/AudioListener

2015-04-14 Thread Paul Adenot
the wild. Additionally, if someone has an idea on what to link to/what to say in the actual deprecation notice, I'm all ears, the current message is more or less a placeholder. Thanks, Paul. [0]: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.platform/5pxl_Ht04sY [1]: https://

Intent to implement and ship `AudioBufferSourceNode.detune`

2015-04-15 Thread Paul Adenot
: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1116852 Other browser support: Blink bug https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=463279 Tests: dom/media/webaudio/test/test_audioBufferSourceNodeRate.html Thanks, Paul. ___ dev-platform mailing

Intent to implement and ship AudioContext.{suspend,resume,close}

2015-04-15 Thread Paul Adenot
me-Promise-void Platform coverage: all Will ship in: 40 Preference behind which this will be implemented: none DevTools bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1154794 Other browser support: Blink Tests: dom/media/webaudio/test/test_audioContextSuspendResumeClose.htm

Re: Intent to implement: Frame Timing API

2015-05-11 Thread Paul Rouget
ing: just make the repaint expensive and see if you end up > delaying timers too much or not. > > > -Boris > ___ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform -

Re: Way to discarding xul is raising HTML.

2015-06-07 Thread Paul Rouget
> > -- > 此致 > 礼 > 罗勇刚 > Yours > sincerely, > Yonggang Luo > ___ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform -- Paul _

Re: Way to discarding xul is raising HTML.

2015-06-08 Thread Paul Rouget
Right. Not supported yet. On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:13 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote: > I also found in pure html window, there is no way to add support for > context menu. > And also popup. > > 2015-06-08 12:17 GMT+08:00 Paul Rouget : >> B2G on desktop only uses HTML. OS int

Re: Way to discarding xul is raising HTML.

2015-06-13 Thread Paul Rouget
native menu, I don't know yet what to do. Maybe re-use the html5 menu element. On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:34 PM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote: > What's the plan to support for menu and popup and tooltip things? > Is there any adaptable way to do that? > > 2015-06-08 18:51

Re: Way to discarding xul is raising HTML.

2015-06-14 Thread Paul Rouget
Yes. On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:10 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote: > 2015-06-14 14:34 GMT+08:00 Paul Rouget : >> For the context menu, it's easy to just use the contextmenu event from >> the Browser API and create a floating div; for popups used by elements >> like , I

Browser API: iframe.executeScript()

2015-06-16 Thread Paul Rouget
rror => { > console.error(error); > }); Any reason to not do that? Any security concerns? Or is there a better way to do that (like a worker)? -- Paul ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Browser API: iframe.executeScript()

2015-06-16 Thread Paul Rouget
To anything that has access to the browser API. So I guess that includes privileged and certified apps. On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > What contexts are you planning to expose this to? Certified apps? > > > On 2015-06-16 11:24 AM, Paul Rouget wrote: >>

Re: atom-shell is electron, what's gecko-shell would be?

2015-06-16 Thread Paul Rouget
> I am looking forward to it. > ___ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform -- Paul ___ dev-platform mailin

Re: Browser API: iframe.executeScript()

2015-06-16 Thread Paul Rouget
and certified apps currently have the ability to perform > universal XSS? Because this would give them that, certainly. > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Paul Rouget wrote: >> >> To anything that has access to the browser API. So I guess that >> includes privileged and ce

Re: atom-shell is electron, what's gecko-shell would be?

2015-06-16 Thread Paul Rouget
It doesn't work on windows yet. It's very much WIP. Not ready for testing. Code is here: https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/larch On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 6:39 PM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote: > Where to download nightly build for Windows ? > 2015-06-17 0:10 GMT+08:00 Paul Rouget :

Re: atom-shell is electron, what's gecko-shell would be?

2015-06-16 Thread Paul Rouget
hromeless so I wanna to fork it under a different name. > Not so sure if that was a good idea.. > 在 2015年6月17日星期三 UTC+8上午12:45:57,Paul Rouget写道: >> It doesn't work on windows yet. It's very much WIP. Not ready for testing. >> Code is here: https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/lar

Re: Browser API: iframe.executeScript()

2015-06-16 Thread Paul Rouget
What would be the right approach to allow such a feature? Would adding a new permission help? On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Bobby Holley wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Paul Rouget wrote: >> >> You mean, being able to inject any script into the content? >> Afa

Re: Browser API: iframe.executeScript()

2015-06-16 Thread Paul Rouget
you basically have no guarantees that your > code does what you expect. > ___ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform -- Paul ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Browser API: iframe.executeScript()

2015-06-16 Thread Paul Rouget
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Bobby Holley wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Paul Rouget wrote: >> >> I don't how this work (Xray vision). > > > Given what you're doing, it's definitely worth learning about. A basic > overview is here

Re: Browser API: iframe.executeScript()

2015-06-16 Thread Paul Rouget
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Andrew Sutherland wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015, at 02:45 PM, Paul Rouget wrote: >> You mentioned XSS. If I understand what you're saying, introducing >> `executeScript` allows anything that has access to the Browser API to >> inject cod

Re: Browser API: iframe.executeScript()

2015-06-16 Thread Paul Rouget
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Bobby Holley wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Paul Rouget wrote: >> >> You mentioned XSS. If I understand what you're saying, introducing >> `executeScript` allows anything that has access to the Browser API to >> inje

Re: Browser API: iframe.executeScript()

2015-06-16 Thread Paul Rouget
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Bobby Holley wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Paul Rouget wrote: >> >> The goal is to build a browser in HTML. Not to run a browser in >> current Firefox Desktop or in Chrome. > > > Ok. Are you also aiming to remov

Re: Browser API: iframe.executeScript()

2015-06-17 Thread Paul Rouget
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Benjamin Francis wrote: > On 16 June 2015 at 16:24, Paul Rouget wrote: >> >> In bug 1174733, I'm proposing a patch to implement the equivalent of >> Google's webview.executeScript: >> >> https://developer.chrome

Re: Browser API: iframe.executeScript()

2015-06-17 Thread Paul Rouget
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Benjamin Francis wrote: > On 17 June 2015 at 13:29, Paul Rouget wrote: >> >> Extending the API every time we want to do something that goes beyond the >> API >> capabilities is painful and slow. > > > Yes I'm acutely a

Re: In http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/b2g/tinderbox-builds/larch-win64/latest/

2015-06-19 Thread Paul Rouget
Please file bugs if you have issues. cc me (:paul). On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 7:24 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote: > The > graphene-41.0a1.en-US.win64.zip > Doesn't package with icu dlls > > -- > 此致 > 礼 > 罗勇刚 > Yours

Re: Intent to implement: Moving DevTools to top level /devtools directory

2015-07-22 Thread Paul Rouget
to...@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-developer-tools -- Paul ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Intent to implement: Moving DevTools to top level /devtools directory

2015-07-22 Thread Paul Rouget
#x27;t use XUL, but we can still open XUL windows. Would it be possible to use the devtools without chrome://browser/ being accessible? > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Paul Rouget wrote: >> >> Does that include getting rid of /browser/ dependencies? >> Ideally, we'd like

Re: Intent to implement: Moving DevTools to top level /devtools directory

2015-07-23 Thread Paul Rouget
hrome://browser/content/utilityOverlay.js, which is Firefox only. On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Panos Astithas wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Paul Rouget wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Panos Astithas wrote: >> > If you are thinking a

Re: Intent to implement: Moving DevTools to top level /devtools directory

2015-07-23 Thread Paul Rouget
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Jeff Griffiths wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:43 AM, J. Ryan Stinnett wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Paul Rouget wrote: >>> I guess by moving things to /devtools/, you also want to update the >>> URLs to chrome://de

Intent to unship: MediaStream.currentTime

2018-10-31 Thread Paul Adenot
the notion of a `currentTime` without playing the `MediaStream` somewhere does not even make sense, since we wouldn't know what clock domain this `MediaStream` is associated with. This is being tracked in bug 1502927. Thanks, Paul. ___ dev-platfo

Re: Intent to unship: MediaStream.currentTime

2018-11-07 Thread Paul Adenot
This has landed on central, and a note has been published on fxsitecompat.com [0]. Thanks, Paul. [0]: https://www.fxsitecompat.com/en-CA/docs/2018/mediastream-currenttime-has-been-removed/ On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:36 PM Paul Adenot wrote: > This member has never been specced, never b

Implemented nsIConsoleService::logMessage logging from parent to content process

2019-09-24 Thread Paul Zühlcke
uot;MyCategory", windowId); Services.console.logMessage(consoleMsg); The bug tracking this: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1559167 Best Regards, Paul ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

nsIPermissionManager Permission Isolation by OriginAttributes

2019-10-16 Thread Paul Zühlcke
private browsing or user context make sure to strip the OriginAttributes from the principal before calling the permission manager. See Bug 1422056 <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1422056> for more information. Best Regards, Paul _

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Audio Working Group

2020-01-22 Thread Paul Adenot
reason why Audio Device Client would perform better or have more features than an AudioContext with the two additions [0] [1] mentioned. Paul. [0]: https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api-v2/issues/13 [1]: https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api-v2/issues/10#issuecomment-531648915

Intent to prototype and ship: Tab modal system prompts

2020-04-16 Thread Paul Zühlcke
le/d/1TEF3sbA9VFV3YipTXQW3U-afnynYQnkn/view?usp=sharing> . Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Best Regards, Paul ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Minimum Required Python Version

2012-09-09 Thread Paul ADENOT
we should make clear that an _additional_ version of Python should be installed, since it's probably easy to overlook. Paul. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Minimum Required Python Version

2012-09-09 Thread Paul ADENOT
On 09/09/2012 10:31 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Paul ADENOT wrote: The next Ubuntu release will include Python 3, and not Python 2.x (on a default install). However, as you note, Python 2.7 will be available as a separate package. I just wanted to mention that

What would be the right approach to hide scrollbars for one document?

2012-09-25 Thread Paul Rouget
ml xul|scrollbar {display:none}', null, null); windowUtils.loadSheet(uri, windowUtils.AGENT_SHEET); ``` But it doesn't appear to work. Any idea? -- Paul ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: What would be the right approach to hide scrollbars for one document?

2012-09-25 Thread Paul Rouget
Neil wrote: > Paul Rouget wrote: > > >For the Firefox Developer Tools, we need to be able to hide the scrollbars > >of a document (in the "Responsive Design Tool"). > > > Scrollbars are native anonymous content so most stylesheets just > don't

Re: What would be the right approach to hide scrollbars for one document?

2012-09-25 Thread Paul Rouget
Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 9/25/12 7:54 AM, Paul Rouget wrote: > >let win = gBrowser.contentWindow; > >let gIOService = > >Components.classes["@mozilla.org/network/io-service;1"].getService(Components.interfaces.nsIIOService); > >let

What is the best way to keep track of all the window objects in a content window?

2012-09-28 Thread Paul Rouget
ia the DOM - add mutations observers to be notified when an iframe is created Is there a better way to do that? -- Paul ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: What is the best way to keep track of all the window objects in a content window?

2012-09-28 Thread Paul Rouget
Paul Rouget wrote: > In the Developer Tools, we often need to get a list of all the windows present > in a page. (main window, iframes, iframes in iframes, …). > We also need to be notified when a new window is created > (createElement("iframe")). > > The naive way

  1   2   >