Re: Google announces Chrome builds for Win64

2014-06-04 Thread jmoradi
Hi folks. I should introduce myself first. I'm a new product manager working on Firefox for Desktop. I've been working on an assessment of launching 64 bit for about 6 weeks. In that time, I've had conversations with representatives from every engineering and QA team whose work would be required

Re: Google announces Chrome builds for Win64

2014-06-04 Thread jmoradi
Great point Brian, I should've mentioned the relation to E10S and sandboxing because as you suggest, it's complicated. - E10S and sandboxing help 32 bit users as well as 64 and arguably offer the most immediate relief to the most users experiencing stability issues. Most of the folks I spoke wi

Re: Google announces Chrome builds for Win64

2014-06-05 Thread jmoradi
These are two good questions Robert. Both points are nuanced and merit more discussion. 1. Re: 64 bit as a bandaid for OOM. This is an alternate viewpoint that a few folks advanced for discussion. I assumed this meant (at the least) PCs with > 4GB physical memory. I'm not sure if this applies

Re: BzAPI Compatibility API has been rolled out to production BMO

2014-06-25 Thread jmoradi
This is terrific! The docs make mention of POST under bz_rest_options. Do you now (or will you at some point) support bug creation via API? Would you do full CRUD at some point? I'm excited to tinker with this. I'd guess REST support will eventually lead to more creative interfaces on top of