Re: Intent to ship: CSS Grid

2016-11-17 Thread Jet Villegas
Unlike other parts of the Grid spec, we don't have sufficient implementor feedback (from ourselves or others) to evaluate the subgrid feature's suitability for implementation. That will take time to get, and we do plan to get it, but we want Grid available to people while we do so. That's not the s

Re: Intent to ship: CSS Grid

2016-11-17 Thread Tantek Çelik
Agreed. In the perspective of the increasing shift toward incubation at W3C (before WG and certainly before WD or CR), subgrid has yet to be sufficiently incubated to really implement in the context of a spec, unlike the rest of grid which has been prototyped with multiple iterations (by other impl

Re: Visual Studio 2017

2016-11-17 Thread Justin Dolske
Until we officially support it, can we have mach print out a warning (w/ link to a bug number or wiki page) if you try to build with it? (And, of course, with some opt-in mechanism to use it anyway.) ISTR in the past it was relatively common for people who upgraded (or were just installing the lat

Re: Visual Studio 2017

2016-11-17 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 02:00:00PM -0800, Justin Dolske wrote: > Until we officially support it, can we have mach print out a warning (w/ > link to a bug number or wiki page) if you try to build with it? (And, of > course, with some opt-in mechanism to use it anyway.) > > ISTR in the past it was r