Re: Proposal: Not shipping prefixed APIs on the release channel

2012-12-08 Thread Randell Jesup
Henri wrote: >It seems to me that we won't get agreement on policy about not >shipping experimental features on the release channel. However, it >seems to me that we could be able to agree not to ship moz-prefixed >APIs on the release channel. > >So I adjust my policy proposal to: >Therefore, I pro

Re: Proposal: Not shipping prefixed APIs on the release channel

2012-12-08 Thread Benoit Jacob
2012/12/5 Henri Sivonen > Therefore, I propose that we adopt the following policy: > 1) Excluding WebGL and WebRTC APIs, new APIs that are shipped on the > release channel shall be shipped without a prefix. > 2) If APIs that don’t already have specs are shipped, we’ll get specs > written. > > (

Re: Integrating ICU into Mozilla build

2012-12-08 Thread Asa Dotzler
On 12/6/2012 6:25 PM, Norbert Lindenberg wrote: Google Chrome is bundling ICU, so they're not limited by what's on the device. How much does this bundling add to the Google Chrome download size. Presumably someone can compile/package Chromium with and without or compare the size of the build

Re: Integrating ICU into Mozilla build

2012-12-08 Thread Neil Harris
On 08/12/12 20:40, Asa Dotzler wrote: On 12/6/2012 6:25 PM, Norbert Lindenberg wrote: Google Chrome is bundling ICU, so they're not limited by what's on the device. How much does this bundling add to the Google Chrome download size. Presumably someone can compile/package Chromium with and wit