On Wednesday, August 15, 2012 4:06:38 PM UTC-7, Dave Mandelin wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 15, 2012 2:03:38 PM UTC-7, Taras Glek wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> >
>
> > According to metrics we have about 1TB of telemetry data in hadoop. This
>
> > is almost a year worth of telemetry data. Our telemetry
On Wednesday, August 15, 2012 2:03:38 PM UTC-7, Taras Glek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to metrics we have about 1TB of telemetry data in hadoop. This
> is almost a year worth of telemetry data. Our telemetry ping packets
> keep growing as we add more probes. As the hadoop database gets bigger,
>
On 8/15/2012 2:42 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 8/15/2012 5:03 PM, Taras Glek wrote:
Hi,
According to metrics we have about 1TB of telemetry data in hadoop.
This is almost a year worth of telemetry data. Our telemetry ping
packets keep growing as we add more probes. As the hadoop database
gets
On 8/15/2012 5:03 PM, Taras Glek wrote:
Hi,
According to metrics we have about 1TB of telemetry data in hadoop.
This is almost a year worth of telemetry data. Our telemetry ping
packets keep growing as we add more probes. As the hadoop database
gets bigger, query times get worse, etc. We need
Hi,
According to metrics we have about 1TB of telemetry data in hadoop. This
is almost a year worth of telemetry data. Our telemetry ping packets
keep growing as we add more probes. As the hadoop database gets bigger,
query times get worse, etc. We need to decide on what data we can throw
away
5 matches
Mail list logo