On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Jason Duell wrote:
> From a glance at the code, it appears that it's safe to Cancel and null-out
> an nsITimer from any given thread, so long as the timer callback that's
> pointed to has thread-safe refcounting. Correct?
At least the HTML parser relies on it be
On 07/19/2012 01:16 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 7/19/12 4:04 PM, Jason Duell wrote:
nsITimer.idl says nothing about thread safety. (Can we add some?)
From a glance at the code, it appears that it's safe to Cancel and
null-out an nsITimer from any given thread, so long as the timer
callback tha
On 7/19/12 4:04 PM, Jason Duell wrote:
nsITimer.idl says nothing about thread safety. (Can we add some?)
From a glance at the code, it appears that it's safe to Cancel and
null-out an nsITimer from any given thread, so long as the timer
callback that's pointed to has thread-safe refcounting. Co
nsITimer.idl says nothing about thread safety. (Can we add some?)
From a glance at the code, it appears that it's safe to Cancel and
null-out an nsITimer from any given thread, so long as the timer
callback that's pointed to has thread-safe refcounting. Correct?
Jason
__
4 matches
Mail list logo
