On Wednesday, August 15, 2012 4:45:14 AM UTC+1, andreas...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
>
> I am curious if XUL Runner has an End-Of-Life policy?
>
> Or is it intimately connected with Firefox, i.e. as long as there is Firefox
> releases based on XUL there will be XUL Runner available too?
>
>
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:56 AM, passfree wrote:
> I am glad to hear that there is at least one person stepping up to support
> xulrunner if a need arises. I also have some apps written on top of xulrunner
> but my gut feeling tells me that xul is not the most future-proof technology.
> Sadly,
On Monday, August 20, 2012 8:22:07 PM UTC+1, Alex Vincent wrote:
> On 8/14/2012 8:45 PM, andreas.pals...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Hi.
>
> >
>
> > I am curious if XUL Runner has an End-Of-Life policy?
>
> > Or is it intimately connected with Firefox, i.e. as long as there is
> > Firefox releases
On 8/14/2012 8:45 PM, andreas.pals...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I am curious if XUL Runner has an End-Of-Life policy?
Or is it intimately connected with Firefox, i.e. as long as there is Firefox
releases based on XUL there will be XUL Runner available too?
The reason I ask if because I am trying to
On 08/16/12 03:51, Neil wrote:
Dave Townsend wrote:
On 08/15/12 12:41, Ben Hearsum wrote:
On 08/15/12 02:57 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
XULRunner is currently an unsupported piece of software, we don't
run tests for it, and we *barely* ensure it still builds.
I don't think this is tru
On 08/15/12 05:57 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
> On 08/15/12 12:41, Ben Hearsum wrote:
>> On 08/15/12 02:57 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
>>> XULRunner is currently an unsupported piece of software, we don't run
>>> tests for it, and we *barely* ensure it still builds.
>>
>> I don't think this is tru
On 08/16/2012 12:51 PM, Neil wrote:
Dave Townsend wrote:
On 08/15/12 12:41, Ben Hearsum wrote:
On 08/15/12 02:57 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
XULRunner is currently an unsupported piece of software, we don't
run tests for it, and we *barely* ensure it still builds.
I don't think this i
Dave Townsend wrote:
On 08/15/12 12:41, Ben Hearsum wrote:
On 08/15/12 02:57 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
XULRunner is currently an unsupported piece of software, we don't
run tests for it, and we *barely* ensure it still builds.
I don't think this is true. It's not tier1, but we ship i
On 08/15/12 12:41, Ben Hearsum wrote:
On 08/15/12 02:57 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
XULRunner is currently an unsupported piece of software, we don't run
tests for it, and we *barely* ensure it still builds.
I don't think this is true. It's not tier1, but we ship it with every
release and
On 08/15/12 02:57 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
> XULRunner is currently an unsupported piece of software, we don't run
> tests for it, and we *barely* ensure it still builds.
I don't think this is true. It's not tier1, but we ship it with every
release and beta. However, I'd be surprised if the
andreas.pals...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I am curious if XUL Runner has an End-Of-Life policy?
Or is it intimately connected with Firefox, i.e. as long as there is Firefox
releases based on XUL there will be XUL Runner available too?
The reason I ask if because I am trying to "standardize" it with
Hi.
I am curious if XUL Runner has an End-Of-Life policy?
Or is it intimately connected with Firefox, i.e. as long as there is Firefox
releases based on XUL there will be XUL Runner available too?
The reason I ask if because I am trying to "standardize" it within my
organization for the next 5-
12 matches
Mail list logo
