I assume all this data/reasoning will be posted in the bug. People
just didn't get around to it yet. The idea was to use the bug to
discuss the issue. There is definitely no decision yet to ship, just a
decision to take a look at some additional data point someone raised.
Andreas
Sent from Mobile
On 13-04-08 10:02 AM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
> Sure. Everything.me was seeing large gains when using lossy image compression
> with an alpha channel compared to png. This isn't a surprise but it's a use
> case that's not well supported by the current image formats we support.
At least not since
Sure. Everything.me was seeing large gains when using lossy image compression
with an alpha channel compared to png. This isn't a surprise but it's a use
case that's not well supported by the current image formats we support.
-Jeff
On 2013-04-08, at 12:53 PM, Ralph Giles wrote:
> On 13-04-08 4
On 13-04-08 4:06 AM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
> No decision has been made yet. We are still evaluating the format.
I think the concern is that none of that re-evaluation has been on a
public list or bug I've seen. Can you clarify what Andreas meant by,
"new data that shows that WebP has valid use cas
No decision has been made yet. We are still evaluating the format.
-Jeff
On 2013-04-08, at 5:09 AM, David Bruant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (I'm not 100% sure this is the proper mailing list to ask this question, but
> I can't think of a more relevant mailing-list at this time. Please forward if
> inap
Hi,
(I'm not 100% sure this is the proper mailing list to ask this question, but I
can't think of a more relevant mailing-list at this time. Please forward if
inappropriate)
After a long period of reluctance, Mozilla is deciding to implement WebP
[1][2]. The only explanation I have been able t
6 matches
Mail list logo
