Re: XULRunner future and ownership

Hi, For those who are still interested in XULRunner, I created a project to maintain the source of xulrunner-stub, and build against Firefox SDK. Here is the link: https://github.com/duanyao/xulrunner-stub Currently only win32 is supported, and Firefox 47a2 is tested. I'd like to ask Mozilla

Re: XULRunner future and ownership

Hi, For those who are still interested in XULRunner, I created a project to maintain the source of xulrunner-stub, and build against Firefox SDK. Here is the link: https://github.com/duanyao/xulrunner-stub Currently only win32 is supported, and Firefox 47a2 is tested. I'd like to ask Mozilla

Re: XULRunner future and ownership

Hi, For those who are still interested in XULRunner (especially the stub), I created a project to continue to build xulrunner-stub with Firefox SDK. Here is the link: https://github.com/duanyao/xulrunner-stub . I extracted xulrunner/stub/nsXULStub.cpp, xpcom/build/nsXPCOMPrivate.h , toolkit/

Re: XULRunner future and ownership

On 22/02/2016 15:28, m.bauermeis...@sto.com wrote: > Is building the runtime manually still an option? If so, how would I > go about it? Are the relevant sources all merged into the Firefox > repository? Xulrunner has just been removed from the tree so your question it obsolete. Phil -- Philip

Re: XULRunner future and ownership

Is building the runtime manually still an option? If so, how would I go about it? Are the relevant sources all merged into the Firefox repository? ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platfor

Re: XULRunner future and ownership

On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 at 11:48:24 AM UTC-5, Dave Townsend wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Devan Shah wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 at 10:43:44 AM UTC-5, Dave Townsend wrote: > >> I'm not sure why that page links to the nightly builds but the release > >> versions a

Re: XULRunner future and ownership

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Devan Shah wrote: > On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 at 10:43:44 AM UTC-5, Dave Townsend wrote: >> I'm not sure why that page links to the nightly builds but the release >> versions are here: http://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/ >> >> Note that Firefox 4

Re: XULRunner future and ownership

On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 at 10:43:44 AM UTC-5, Dave Townsend wrote: > I'm not sure why that page links to the nightly builds but the release > versions are here: http://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/ > > Note that Firefox 45 hasn't been released yet so the latest SDK is for > one

Re: XULRunner future and ownership

I'm not sure why that page links to the nightly builds but the release versions are here: http://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/ Note that Firefox 45 hasn't been released yet so the latest SDK is for one of the beta versions. On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Devan Shah wrote: > On Wedn

Re: XULRunner future and ownership

On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 2:30:54 PM UTC-4, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > The Mozilla project no longer sees XULRunner as a priority project. It's > not core to advancing the open web or any of our current or planned > products. > > As Ben Hearsum noted a couple weeks ago, we are turning off a

Re: XULRunner future and ownership

On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 2:30:54 PM UTC-4, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > The Mozilla project no longer sees XULRunner as a priority project. It's > not core to advancing the open web or any of our current or planned > products. > I'm looking at creating a simple XUL app as a way of replacing

Re: XULRunner future and ownership

> reverendli...@gmail.com > July 30, 2015 at 10:17 AM > > I'll volunteer to help out with documentation. > ___ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: XULRunner future and ownership

I’d like to finetune my earlier statement - after talking things over a bit with Benjamin - to say: I’d like to volunteer if there’s no one else moving forward to take this project on. The reason is that I’m not currently working on or using XULRunner tech, so my level of engagement is low. I’m

Re: XULRunner future and ownership

On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 8:44:57 PM UTC-6, Eric Shepherd wrote: > Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > > I am looking to see whether there is an alternate owner who is > > interested in the task of keeping XULRunner building and running > > properly and reviewing patches to XULRuner-specific code. Plea

Re: XULRunner future and ownership

Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > I am looking to see whether there is an alternate owner who is > interested in the task of keeping XULRunner building and running > properly and reviewing patches to XULRuner-specific code. Please > contact me if you want to nominate yourself or somebody else for this > r

Re: XULRunner future and ownership

XULRunner is dead, Long live XULRunner! On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > The Mozilla project no longer sees XULRunner as a priority project. It's > not core to advancing the open web or any of our current or planned > products. > > As Ben Hearsum noted a couple weeks

Re: XULRunner future and ownership

I’d like to volunteer. Not much more to say, really :-) Cheers, Mike. > On 29 Jul 2015, at 20:30, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > > The Mozilla project no longer sees XULRunner as a priority project. It's not > core to advancing the open web or any of our current or planned products. > > As Ben

Re: XULRunner future and ownership

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Fabrice Desré wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:30:00 -0400, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > > > If I do not find a suitable owner in the next two weeks, I intend to > > remove the XULRunner code from the mozilla-central repository on > > 14-August. > > Two weeks during

Re: XULRunner future and ownership

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:30:00 -0400, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > If I do not find a suitable owner in the next two weeks, I intend to > remove the XULRunner code from the mozilla-central repository on > 14-August. Two weeks during summer time seems a bit short. You may not get interested people th