On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 01:24:27PM +1000, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
> Thanks for the tip. I've updated the last part of the script accordingly:
>
> # Count number of bytes in the xptdata.o file.
> cd o64
> echo -n "xptdata.o bytes: "
> wc --bytes xpcom/reflect/xptinfo/xptdata.o
> cd ..
>
> The c
Thanks for the tip. I've updated the last part of the script accordingly:
# Count number of bytes in the xptdata.o file.
cd o64
echo -n "xptdata.o bytes: "
wc --bytes xpcom/reflect/xptinfo/xptdata.o
cd ..
The current measurements are now:
Tue, Jun 26, 2018: m-i 423583:4a20ed6e2fee
.idl files: 90
Measuring the size of the xpt files is no longer as relevant. Since mccr8
and I rewrote xptinfo, they're only used during the build step, and are not
bundled. They're combined into a single .cpp file (xptdata.cpp) which
generates shared static pages (mostly) without relocations :-).
Perhaps measur
On 6/26/18 12:45 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
What's the relative value of making something not use xpidl anymore
vs. marking an xpidl interface as no longer [scriptable]?
I think the main value is in not using xpidl anymore, for two reasons:
1) You can't devirtualize things while still using xpi
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 09:45:22PM -0700, L. David Baron wrote:
On Tuesday 2018-06-26 14:29 +1000, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
The trend is clearly down, except for the large increase in .xpt size for
the most recent measurement -- note the extra digit! It appears that .xpt
files used to be binar
On Tuesday 2018-06-26 14:29 +1000, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
> The trend is clearly down, except for the large increase in .xpt size for
> the most recent measurement -- note the extra digit! It appears that .xpt
> files used to be binary, and now they are JSON. This might be related to
> mccr8's
6 matches
Mail list logo
