Re: Try syntax is no longer required when pushing to try

2016-03-04 Thread Armen Zambrano G.
On 16-03-03 08:35 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Andrew Halberstadt > wrote: > >> With treeherder's "Add New Jobs" [1] UI, using try syntax is no longer >> the only way to schedule stuff on try. As of now, it's possible to push >> to try without any try syntax. If you do

Re: Try syntax is no longer required when pushing to try

2016-03-04 Thread Armen Zambrano G.
On 16-03-04 01:22 AM, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 12:25:53PM -0500, Andrew Halberstadt wrote: >> With treeherder's "Add New Jobs" [1] UI, using try syntax is no longer >> the only way to schedule stuff on try. As of now, it's possible to push >> to try without any try syntax. If yo

Re: Try syntax is no longer required when pushing to try

2016-03-03 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 12:25:53PM -0500, Andrew Halberstadt wrote: > With treeherder's "Add New Jobs" [1] UI, using try syntax is no longer > the only way to schedule stuff on try. As of now, it's possible to push > to try without any try syntax. If you do this, no jobs will be scheduled > on your

Re: Try syntax is no longer required when pushing to try

2016-03-03 Thread Xidorn Quan
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Andrew Halberstadt wrote: > With treeherder's "Add New Jobs" [1] UI, using try syntax is no longer > the only way to schedule stuff on try. As of now, it's possible to push > to try without any try syntax. If you do this, no jobs will be scheduled > on your push an

Re: Try syntax is no longer required when pushing to try

2016-03-03 Thread Andrew Halberstadt
On 03/03/16 12:37 PM, Andreas Tolfsen wrote: On 3 March 2016 at 17:25, Andrew Halberstadt wrote: With treeherder's "Add New Jobs" [1] UI, using try syntax is no longer the only way to schedule stuff on try. As of now, it's possible to push to try without any try syntax. If you do this, no jobs

Re: Try syntax is no longer required when pushing to try

2016-03-03 Thread Andreas Tolfsen
On 3 March 2016 at 17:25, Andrew Halberstadt wrote: > With treeherder's "Add New Jobs" [1] UI, using try syntax is no longer > the only way to schedule stuff on try. As of now, it's possible to push > to try without any try syntax. If you do this, no jobs will be scheduled > on your push and it wi