On 7/11/2014 5:59 PM, cdaw...@mozilla.com wrote:
Hi Joshua-- I work on the Treeherder dev team. Would you be up for
> writing a few bugs against Treeherder on what you found? Here’s a
> link to do so:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Tree%20Management
I did talk to people
On Friday, July 11, 2014 3:59:41 PM UTC-7, cda...@mozilla.com wrote:
> On Monday, July 7, 2014 4:44:50 PM UTC-7, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote:
>
> > On 7/7/2014 5:25 PM, Jonathan Griffin wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > Filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1035464 for those
>
> >
>
> > > that w
On Monday, July 7, 2014 4:44:50 PM UTC-7, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote:
> On 7/7/2014 5:25 PM, Jonathan Griffin wrote:
>
> > Filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1035464 for those
>
> > that would like to follow along.
>
>
>
> Perhaps bug 890116 is a better measure of tracking.
>
>
On 7/7/2014 5:25 PM, Jonathan Griffin wrote:
Filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1035464 for those
that would like to follow along.
Perhaps bug 890116 is a better measure of tracking.
--
Joshua Cranmer
Thunderbird and DXR developer
Source code archæologist
_
Filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1035464 for those
that would like to follow along.
Jonathan
On 7/7/2014 3:22 PM, Jonathan Griffin wrote:
So it sounds like it would be valuable to add try syntax to trigger
this, as well as produce periodic reports. Most of the work needed
So it sounds like it would be valuable to add try syntax to trigger
this, as well as produce periodic reports. Most of the work needed is
the same.
I'll file a bug to track this; I don't have an ETA for starting work on
it, but we want to get to it before things bitrot.
Jonathan
On 7/7/20
On 7/7/2014 1:11 PM, Jonathan Griffin wrote:
I guess a related question is, if we could run this periodically on
TBPL, what would be the right frequency?
Several years ago, I did a project where I ran code-coverage on roughly
every nightly build of Thunderbird [1] (and I still have those
resu
This looks awesome, Joshua! Thanks for doing this. CCing Sylvestre who
has also started to look into this...
Cheers,
Ehsan
On 2014-07-07, 1:02 AM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote:
I don't know how many people follow code-coverage updates in general,
but I've produced relatively up-to-date code cover
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Jonathan Griffin
wrote:
> I guess a related question is, if we could run this periodically on TBPL,
> what would be the right frequency?
>
> We could potentially create a job in buidlbot that would handle the
> downloading/post-processing, which might be a bit fas
I guess a related question is, if we could run this periodically on
TBPL, what would be the right frequency?
We could potentially create a job in buidlbot that would handle the
downloading/post-processing, which might be a bit faster than doing it
on an external system.
Jonathan
On 7/7/2014
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧
wrote:
> Effectively, only xpcshell tests, and the M, M-e10s, and R groups are
> represented in the output data. M-e10s is slightly borked: only M-e10s(1)
> [I think] is shown, because, well, treeherder didn't distinguish between
> the five of the
On 7/7/2014 11:39 AM, Jonathan Griffin wrote:
Hey Joshua,
That's awesome!
How long does the try run take that generated this data? We should
consider scheduling a periodic job to collect this data and track it
over time.
Well, it depends on how overloaded try is at the moment. ^_^
The bui
Hey Joshua,
That's awesome!
How long does the try run take that generated this data? We should
consider scheduling a periodic job to collect this data and track it
over time.
Jonathan
On 7/6/2014 10:02 PM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote:
I don't know how many people follow code-coverage updates in
13 matches
Mail list logo
