On 2015-09-28 1:54 PM, joel maher wrote:
For the opened bugs it would be nice to know to focus on ones that have
>1 instance, that means that there is a much higher chance to reproduce
the bug rather than letting hundreds (or even 1000+) of test runs go by
without seeing another instance of the
For the opened bugs it would be nice to know to focus on ones that have >1
instance, that means that there is a much higher chance to reproduce the
bug rather than letting hundreds (or even 1000+) of test runs go by without
seeing another instance of the failure.
-Joel
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 1:
Included auto-closed bugs in that count sounds misleading at best.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Wes Kocher wrote:
> What if the query was changed to only count bugs resolved 'fixed'? I
> believe all of the inactive intermittent bugs get closed as worksforme or
> invalid?
>
> On Mon, Sep 28,
What if the query was changed to only count bugs resolved 'fixed'? I
believe all of the inactive intermittent bugs get closed as worksforme or
invalid?
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Ehsan Akhgari
wrote:
> On 2015-09-28 7:26 AM, Carsten Book wrote:
>
>> 3. Statistics
>>
>> Intermittent Bugs f
On 2015-09-28 7:26 AM, Carsten Book wrote:
3. Statistics
Intermittent Bugs filed this month [1]: 400
Intermittent Bugs closed this month [2]: 214
In the past couple of weekends, I spent some time fixing the worst
offenders in intermittent oranges according to OrangeFactor, and the
number 214
5 matches
Mail list logo
