Re: Quantum Flow Engineering Newsletter #20

2017-08-22 Thread Salvador de la Puente
Congratulations for this 20th issue of the newsletter and for all the hard work that the Quantum team is doing! On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Olli Pettay wrote: > > > On 08/18/2017 08:28 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Ryan VanderMeulen < >> rvandermeu...@mozill

Re: Quantum Flow Engineering Newsletter #20

2017-08-21 Thread Olli Pettay
On 08/18/2017 08:28 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Ryan VanderMeulen mailto:rvandermeu...@mozilla.com>> wrote: Is there a good way to get a sense of what the higher-impact bugs are that remain for improving Speedometer? Just going through the deps is difficu

Re: Quantum Flow Engineering Newsletter #20

2017-08-18 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Ryan VanderMeulen < rvandermeu...@mozilla.com> wrote: > Is there a good way to get a sense of what the higher-impact bugs are that > remain for improving Speedometer? Just going through the deps is difficult > because it's hard to assess how much of a win some of t

Re: Quantum Flow Engineering Newsletter #20

2017-08-18 Thread Ryan VanderMeulen
Is there a good way to get a sense of what the higher-impact bugs are that remain for improving Speedometer? Just going through the deps is difficult because it's hard to assess how much of a win some of those are. Are we gated mostly on JS perf at this point? Layout? Something else? :-) Thanks!