On Friday 2016-09-30 14:02 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote:
> Also, just found this in the charter:
> announcement
> Not really acceptable.
I think it should link to the same URL as the other "(announcement)"
link.
-David
--
𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂
𝄢 Mozi
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 12:51 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> On Thursday 2016-09-29 07:46 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote:
>> > Marked as deliverables to be taken up if incubation suggests likely
>> > success:
>> > Background Synchronisation; Filesystem API; FindText API; HTML Import;
>> > Input Methods
On Thursday 2016-09-29 07:46 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote:
> > Marked as deliverables to be taken up if incubation suggests likely success:
> > Background Synchronisation; Filesystem API; FindText API; HTML Import;
> > Input Methods; Packaging; Quota API
>
> This section is confusing and weakly wor
On Thursday 2016-09-29 10:42 +0200, Ms2ger wrote:
> On 29/09/16 03:02, L. David Baron wrote:
> > The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
> >
> > Web Platform Working Group (formerly Web Applications WG & HTML WG)
> > https://www.w3.org/2016/08/web-platform-charter-draft.html
> > https://
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 9/29/16 10:46 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
>>>
>>> New deliverables:
>>>Microdata
>>
>>
>> This should be dropped from the charter (FO).
>>
>> Ironic to see this since Firefox (release!) just dropped support for
>> Microdata
>
>
> Are they
On 9/29/16 11:21 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
All of what was previously abandoned. The charter
http://www.w3.org/2016/08/web-platform-charter-draft.html#deliverables
links to the 2013 Microdata Note.
I did see that it linked to the note. It wasn't clear whether that
means "revive everything in th
On 9/29/16 10:46 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
New deliverables:
Microdata
This should be dropped from the charter (FO).
Ironic to see this since Firefox (release!) just dropped support for
Microdata
Are they talking about the HTML microdata API (what we dropped) or just
specifying the HTML mi
Note the major changes summary:
https://www.w3.org/2016/08/web-platform-charter-draft.html#changes-from-wp1
This is my first pass review (already found problems).
I may try to review in more depth to see what (if any) specific
wording changes there are in the charter (is there a paragraph by
par
On 29/09/16 03:02, L. David Baron wrote:
> The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
>
> Web Platform Working Group (formerly Web Applications WG & HTML WG)
> https://www.w3.org/2016/08/web-platform-charter-draft.html
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2016Sep/0001.html
9 matches
Mail list logo
