On 2016-07-01 06:10 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 03:07:43PM +1000, Xidorn Quan wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
William Lachance writes:
As part of a larger effort to improve the experience around
debugging intermittents, I've been looking at re
On 2016-07-01 6:10 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > One thing that might be helpful is enabling running only tests on
> > try with a designated build that has already been created.
> >
> > Often tests are modified to add logging, after which the same
> > build could be run with the new version of the t
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 03:07:43PM +1000, Xidorn Quan wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
>
> > William Lachance writes:
> >
> > > As part of a larger effort to improve the experience around
> > > debugging intermittents, I've been looking at reducing the time it
> > >
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
> William Lachance writes:
>
> > As part of a larger effort to improve the experience around
> > debugging intermittents, I've been looking at reducing the time it
> > takes for common "try" workloads for developers (so that
> > e.g. retrigger
William Lachance writes:
> As part of a larger effort to improve the experience around
> debugging intermittents, I've been looking at reducing the time it
> takes for common "try" workloads for developers (so that
> e.g. retriggering a job to reproduce a failure can happen faster).
> Also, accou
5 matches
Mail list logo