Re: Intent to unship: TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1

2020-06-25 Thread yuhongbao_386
> [6] https://sql.telemetry.mozilla.org/queries/64283#164115 shows values for > Release, which puts TLS 1.0 between 0.46% and 0.68% depending on the time > of week. TLS 1.1 is virtually non-existent at 0.02%, we could have removed > that already if it weren’t for the fact that this isn’t how TLS v

Re: Intent to unship: TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1

2019-12-06 Thread Graham Perrin
On 05/12/2019 22:34, Martin Thomson wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 5:08 AM > wrote: >> … Safari, Firefox, Edge and Chrome are removing support for TLS 1.0 and 1.1 in March of 2020. … Is that (timeline) still a _shared_ intent – for all four browsers?

Re: Intent to unship: TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1

2019-12-06 Thread Martin Thomson
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 5:08 AM wrote: > >> … Safari, Firefox, Edge and Chrome are removing support for TLS 1.0 and > 1.1 in March of 2020. … > > Is that (timeline) still a _shared_ intent – for all four browsers? > I recently confirmed this, yes. > Re: the screenshot at < > https://user-images

Re: Intent to unship: TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1

2019-12-05 Thread grahamperrin
On Thursday, 12 September 2019 05:03:57 UTC+1, Martin Thomson wrote: … > [2] https://hacks.mozilla.org/2019/05/tls-1-0-and-1-1-removal-update/ … From the linked post: >> … Safari, Firefox, Edge and Chrome are removing support for TLS 1.0 and 1.1 >> in March of 2020. … Is that (timeline) s

Re: Intent to unship: TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1

2019-10-09 Thread Martin Thomson
On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 6:35 PM wrote: > I would agree that these changes and changes that have already occurred > over the last year or so, have broken access to admin consoles of older > networking kit. I had to pull a WinXP machine out of storage recently to > manage an HP 2610 switch. > For t

Re: Intent to unship: TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1

2019-10-06 Thread rpedrica
On Friday, 13 September 2019 12:36:56 UTC+2, Henri Sivonen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:09 AM Martin Thomson wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 5:50 PM Henri Sivonen wrote: > >> > >> Do we know what the situation looks like for connections to RFC 1918 > >> addresses? > > > > That's a

Re: Intent to unship: TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1

2019-09-13 Thread Henri Sivonen
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:09 AM Martin Thomson wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 5:50 PM Henri Sivonen wrote: >> >> Do we know what the situation looks like for connections to RFC 1918 >> addresses? > > That's a hard one to even speculate about, and that's all we really have > there. Our tele

Re: Intent to unship: TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1

2019-09-12 Thread Martin Thomson
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 5:50 PM Henri Sivonen wrote: > Do we know what the situation looks like for connections to RFC 1918 > addresses? > That's a hard one to even speculate about, and that's all we really have there. Our telemetry doesn't really allow us to gain insight into that. The big que

Re: Intent to unship: TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1

2019-09-12 Thread Henri Sivonen
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:03 AM Martin Thomson wrote: > Telemetry shows that TLS 1.0 usage is much higher > than we would ordinarily tolerate for this sort of deprecation Do we know what the situation looks like for connections to RFC 1918 addresses? > Finally, we will disable TLS 1.0 and 1.1 fo