Hi J.C.!
Thanks for your extensive answer! Seems like there is a lot of progress
going on that wasn't immediately obvious from bugzilla. I am looking
forward to seeing this land.
Thank you,
Tom
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:46 AM, J.C. Jones wrote:
> Tom,
>
> We're making progress on supporting th
Tom,
We're making progress on supporting the USB U2F HID token attestation
format; before the actual U2F/HID code starts appearing in-tree, there's
had to be some refactoring to handle things in a proper asynchronous way --
which is nearing review.
I'm working on that USB U2F support for OSX righ
So what's our status with regards to implementing FIDO u2f? I really would
like to use my security key natively in Firefox.
Best,
Tom
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Anders Rundgren <
anders.rundgren@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 10:27:30 PM UTC+1, JC Jones wrote:
> > An
On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 10:27:30 PM UTC+1, JC Jones wrote:
> Anders,
>
> The first target I'm working on is Desktop, though I've plans in 2017 to
> support WebAuthn on Android and iOS [1], too. WebAuthn already has
> definitions suitable for Android's Key Attestation [2] and SafetyNet
> for
Anders,
The first target I'm working on is Desktop, though I've plans in 2017 to
support WebAuthn on Android and iOS [1], too. WebAuthn already has
definitions suitable for Android's Key Attestation [2] and SafetyNet
formats [3], so they'll need implementations that tie into the
dom::WebAuthentica
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 5:42:30 PM UTC+1, Anders Rundgren wrote:
> It is a pity that external tokens have become the
> focus when the majority will rather rely on embedded
> security solutions which nowadays is a standard feature
> in Android and Windows platforms.
Slight clarification
n a filter. Re-sending for posterity on the
> list.
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: J.C. Jones
> Date: Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Intent to implement and ship: Web Authentication
> To: berniepa...@gmail.com
> Cc: dev-platform@lists.mozill
Le lundi 14 novembre 2016 22:41:37 UTC+1, berni...@gmail.com a écrit :
> Le lundi 14 novembre 2016 18:34:11 UTC+1, JC Jones a écrit :
> > Bernie,
> >
> > You're right that the current WD does not contain the "U2F HID token"
> > attestation format, but the WG is _intending_ to add it [1] -- and sup
Le lundi 14 novembre 2016 18:34:11 UTC+1, JC Jones a écrit :
> Bernie,
>
> You're right that the current WD does not contain the "U2F HID token"
> attestation format, but the WG is _intending_ to add it [1] -- and support
> for such devices -- in Working Draft 4 [2] as soon as a larger in-document
Bernie,
You're right that the current WD does not contain the "U2F HID token"
attestation format, but the WG is _intending_ to add it [1] -- and support
for such devices -- in Working Draft 4 [2] as soon as a larger in-document
refactor is complete.
I won't guarantee success at this point, but I
Le vendredi 11 novembre 2016 22:18:58 UTC+1, JC Jones a écrit :
> The W3C Web Authentication Working Group [1] was formed to produce a
> browser-facing standard for using strong, cryptographic scoped credentials
> to authenticate to web applications in an un-phishable way. The Working
> Group began
11 matches
Mail list logo
