Re: Intent to implement and ship: RTCDTMFSender

2016-08-26 Thread Randell Jesup
>>David, do you know whether Edge is generally planning to implement this too >>as they implement the WebRTC API? What about Safari? > >Edge is generally onboard with the DMTF API from what I know, though I >haven't discussed specifics with them. We did talk about it a little at >Cluecon (Freeswi

Re: Intent to implement and ship: RTCDTMFSender

2016-08-26 Thread Randell Jesup
>On 8/26/16 8:30 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >I filed a few more. Mostly editorial, but >https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/775 is substantive. Thanks. We'll get that dealt with. >David, do you know whether Edge is generally planning to implement this too >as they implement the WebRTC API

Re: Intent to implement and ship: RTCDTMFSender

2016-08-26 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 8/26/16 8:30 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: I ended up filing some GitHub issues. Thank you. I was about to file some of those too... I filed a few more. Mostly editorial, but https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/775 is substantive. David, do you know whether Edge is generally plannin

Re: Intent to implement and ship: RTCDTMFSender

2016-08-26 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Daniel Minor wrote: > Link to standard: https://www.w3.org/TR/webrtc/#peer-to-peer-dtmf I ended up filing some GitHub issues. The IDL there is somewhat wrong (at least if this is indeed an event target as the standard makes it out to be) and I noted a couple of ot