On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> On 24/06/14 16:30, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> I don't understand why anyone would want to key gets and sets using
>> FontFace instances. I.e. why would you want to ever call
>> fontFaceSet.has(myFontFace). That returning false doesn't re
On 24/06/14 17:21, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
That part of IDL is wrong. That needs to be fixed to use
Symbol.iterator.
Yep, aware of that.
And ideally an easier way to define an iterator than
having to define the entire thing. E.g. for something like FormData
all you need is iterating over Arr
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> Yes hence the "something similar". :-) Was just easiest for working with
> while implementing. Making the object iterable seems like the right thing
> to do, but our bindings generation scripts don't handle "iterator" in IDL
> yet.
Tha
On 6/24/14, 2:59 AM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
Yes hence the "something similar". :-) Was just easiest for working
with while implementing. Making the object iterable seems like the
right thing to do, but our bindings generation scripts don't handle
"iterator" in IDL yet.
That's at least in pa
On 24/06/14 16:30, Jonas Sicking wrote:
I don't understand why anyone would want to key gets and sets using
FontFace instances. I.e. why would you want to ever call
fontFaceSet.has(myFontFace). That returning false doesn't really tell
you anything about what fonts are or are not loaded.
It tell
On 24/06/14 16:35, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
No, no more indexed getters. You should know!
Yes hence the "something similar". :-) Was just easiest for working
with while implementing. Making the object iterable seems like the
right thing to do, but our bindings generation scripts don't handl
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:02 AM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> No. There's a note in the spec that says [SetClass] will be removed in
> favour of members on the interface that feel like a Set, but there's nothing
> concrete in there yet. I'm proceeding with something simple for the moment
> (add, h
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> On 24/06/14 06:30, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> Has the [MapClass] issue been resolved yet?
>
> No. There's a note in the spec that says [SetClass] will be removed in
> favour of members on the interface that feel like a Set, but there's n
On 24/06/14 06:30, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Has the [MapClass] issue been resolved yet?
No. There's a note in the spec that says [SetClass] will be removed in
favour of members on the interface that feel like a Set, but there's
nothing concrete in there yet. I'm proceeding with something simple
Has the [MapClass] issue been resolved yet?
/ Jonas
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> Summary: The CSS Font Loading API provides a mechanism for authors to load a
> font from the network that can then be used from the font-family property.
> This allows control over wh
Yes, please!
Cross-posting to B2G-Internal as we've been discussing font loading hacks on a
separate thread re: icon fonts. This font loading API should help.
Thanks,
--Jet
- Original Message -
From: "Cameron McCormack"
To: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 11
11 matches
Mail list logo
