On 13/03/2019 01:46, flor...@rivoal.net wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 13, 2019 at 8:36:17 AM UTC+9, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote:
>> On 13/03/2019 00:22, Florian Rivoal wrote:
>>> Given that this is not merely setting a limit because you find that
>>> implementation more convenient, but actually a ca
On Wednesday, March 13, 2019 at 8:36:17 AM UTC+9, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote:
> On 13/03/2019 00:22, Florian Rivoal wrote:
> > Given that this is not merely setting a limit because you find that
> > implementation more convenient, but actually a case of considering it
> > desirable to ignore larg
On 13/03/2019 00:22, flor...@rivoal.net wrote:
> Given that this is not merely setting a limit because you find that
> implementation more convenient, but actually a case of considering it
> desirable to ignore large cursors in certain cases (and for security reasons
> even), I wonder if this is
Given that this is not merely setting a limit because you find that
implementation more convenient, but actually a case of considering it desirable
to ignore large cursors in certain cases (and for security reasons even), I
wonder if this is something that we should consider including in the
sp
4 matches
Mail list logo
