Re: Feedback requested: UI changes for Treeherder

2016-10-10 Thread Phil Ringnalda
On 10/10/16 11:57 AM, Jonathan Griffin wrote: > We may implement these wireframes for non-sheriffs, or on a per-user basis, > or only for Try. Thinking in terms of "developers look at single pushes on try, sheriffs look at multiple pushes on non-try" is wrong on all four counts. Many of the develo

Re: Feedback requested: UI changes for Treeherder

2016-10-10 Thread Sebastian Hengst
TL;DR - UI got more verbose, elements unnecessary hidden - Too much vertical space used - Passes and failures shouldn't be separated - failure log becomes longer because of failure snippets User persona Developers: - check the results of their own pushes to Try and own pushes to official reposi

Re: Feedback requested: UI changes for Treeherder

2016-10-10 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 10/10/16 2:57 PM, Jonathan Griffin wrote: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3__-vbLGlRHajhEOE1SVXBQUU0/view?usp=sharing Just to check, were these wireframes tested at window widths around 1000px or so? All the screenshots there are pretty wide, looks like. Moving the commit info to above