On 8/5/2014 9:14 AM, rviti...@mozilla.com wrote:
What do you mean exactly by addon validation warning?
I mean an rule in the AMO automated checking/validation system: normally
they are simple grep rules to detect that an addon is using an obsolete
interface or code pattern. This will warn on n
On Monday, August 4, 2014 8:55:35 PM UTC+1, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
> This does involve a one-time import of localstore data into the new
> format, correct?
Correct.
>
> I'm happy that we are doing this. I *believe* that this may be the last
> client of the RDF code in Firefox, which may all
On 8/4/14 9:55 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 7/22/2014 8:47 AM, Roberto Agostino Vitillo wrote:
Localstore.rdf will soon be replaced with a json store (see Bug
559505). I am currently planning to leave the localstore.rdf
implementation as it is and issue a warning when a client tries to
acces
On 8/4/2014 5:06 PM, Gavin Sharp wrote:
This is certainly a big one, but
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=833098&maxdepth=1&hide_resolved=1
suggests we will still need to worry about mimeTypes.rdf and
install.rdf/update.rdf, unfortunately...
ok. mimeTypes.rdf is read/writ
How many of these, if any, are used on b2g?
- Kyle
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Gavin Sharp wrote:
> This is certainly a big one, but
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=833098&maxdepth=1&hide_resolved=1
> suggests we will still need to worry about mimeTypes.rdf and
> ins
This is certainly a big one, but
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=833098&maxdepth=1&hide_resolved=1
suggests we will still need to worry about mimeTypes.rdf and
install.rdf/update.rdf, unfortunately...
Gavin
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Benjamin Smedberg
wrote:
>
> On 7
On 7/22/2014 8:47 AM, Roberto Agostino Vitillo wrote:
Localstore.rdf will soon be replaced with a json store (see Bug 559505). I am
currently planning to leave the localstore.rdf implementation as it is and
issue a warning when a client tries to access to it. This is needed as some
add-ons se
On 28/07/2014 08:08, Jim Porter wrote:
> On 07/23/2014 07:10 AM, rviti...@mozilla.com wrote:
>> Are there any objections or remarks to the deprecation of
>> localstore.rdf?
>
> Just to be proactive, is there anything that other applications (read:
> Thunderbird) will need to do about this, or will
On 07/23/2014 07:10 AM, rviti...@mozilla.com wrote:
> Are there any objections or remarks to the deprecation of
> localstore.rdf?
Just to be proactive, is there anything that other applications (read:
Thunderbird) will need to do about this, or will it just automatically work?
- Jim
_
Mike Hommey wrote:
Who would object to less use of the rdf code?
Especially as you get to reinvent each replacement independently!
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.m
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 05:10:33AM -0700, rviti...@mozilla.com wrote:
> Localstore.rdf will soon be replaced with a json store (see Bug
> 559505). I am currently planning to leave the localstore.rdf
> implementation as it is and issue a warning when a client tries to
> access to it. This is needed
On 23 Jul 2014, at 14:10, rviti...@mozilla.com wrote:
> Localstore.rdf will soon be replaced with a json store (see Bug 559505). I am
> currently planning to leave the localstore.rdf implementation as it is and
> issue a warning when a client tries to access to it. This is needed as some
> add-
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 05:10:33AM -0700, rviti...@mozilla.com wrote:
> Localstore.rdf will soon be replaced with a json store (see Bug 559505). I am
> currently planning to leave the localstore.rdf implementation as it is and
> issue a warning when a client tries to access to it. This is needed
13 matches
Mail list logo
