As one of the lonely few peers for our XBL implementation, I am thrilled
that this is finally happening. My deepest gratitude to everyone involved!
bholley
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Dave Townsend
wrote:
> Having not heard any show-stopping concerns with the plan we will start to
> proce
Having not heard any show-stopping concerns with the plan we will start to
proceed with it. In Q4 we intend to:
- Migrate a few bindings and update the plan based on what we learn
- Land XUL support for Custom Elements
- Create tooling to make converting bindings easier
- Begin a b
> On Oct 22, 2017, at 3:35 AM, smaug wrote:
>
> On 10/21/2017 11:45 PM, Yura Zenevich wrote:
>> I would also like to bring to the team's attention another force worth
>> being on the radar (in terms of "forces on the system") - accessibility.
>> One theme that seems to consistently happen with r
2017年10月22日 下午6:45，"smaug" 寫道：
On 10/21/2017 01:14 PM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
> On 10/20/17 7:47 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
>
>> For some time now we've been talking about moving away from XUL and XBL.
>> The browser architecture team has been hard at work figuring out how to go
>> about doing that
On 10/21/2017 01:14 PM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
On 10/20/17 7:47 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
For some time now we've been talking about moving away from XUL and XBL.
The browser architecture team has been hard at work figuring out how to go
about doing that and we're ready to share the first of our
On 10/21/2017 11:45 PM, Yura Zenevich wrote:
I would also like to bring to the team's attention another force worth
being on the radar (in terms of "forces on the system") - accessibility.
One theme that seems to consistently happen with re-writes such as the ones
from xul to React is regressions
I would also like to bring to the team's attention another force worth
being on the radar (in terms of "forces on the system") - accessibility.
One theme that seems to consistently happen with re-writes such as the ones
from xul to React is regressions in terms of accessibility of newly
re-written
On 10/20/17 7:47 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
> For some time now we've been talking about moving away from XUL and XBL.
> The browser architecture team has been hard at work figuring out how to go
> about doing that and we're ready to share the first of our proposals more
> widely. We have developed a
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017, at 01:47 AM, Dave Townsend wrote:
> Are there any other concerns that we're missing?
One thing I'm wondering about is memory usage of the Web Components
implementations of these components compared to the XBL ones.
Specifically for style, XBL has the ability to list the style
9 matches
Mail list logo
